Preview

Oncohematology

Advanced search

Long-term continuous treatment as a new strategy for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma

https://doi.org/10.17650/1818-8346-2020-15-2-29-41

Abstract

The prognosis for patients with multiple myeloma has improved substantially over the past decade with the development of new, more effective chemotherapeutic agents and regimens, and improved management of toxicities. Treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma represents a vital aspect of the overall care for patients with multiple myeloma and a critical area of ongoing biologic and clinical research. The choice of regimen at relapse is usually based on the prior response, toxicities, assessment of prognostic factors, age and comorbidities of individual patients, their somatic condition and expected effectiveness and tolerability. The new drugs, such as ixazomib, carfilzomib, pomalidomide, daratumumab and elotuzumab in combinations in doublet or triplet regimens, have greatly increased the treatment armory against myeloma. Long-term continuous therapies as a new strategy for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma have been shown to provide an eradicating of minimal residual disease and deep prolong responses, with the goal of improving progression-free survival and overall survival. The integration of novel agents into the treatment paradigm has shifted the perception of multiple myeloma from an incurable fatal disease to a manageable chronic one. This review discusses the most recent and effective regimens for the relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma treatment, based on the results of recently published phase II and III clinical trials. Analyses the current clinical trial data discussed with a focus on lenalidomide or bortezomib as a basis of new treatment regimens.

About the Author

S. V. Semochkin
N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia; City Clinical Hospital No 52, Moscow Healthcare Department
Russian Federation

1 Ostrovityanova St., Moscow 117997, 

3 Pekhotnaya St., Moscow 123182



References

1. Pop V.P., Kozlov G.K., Pravosudov V.V. et al. Multiple myeloma and related diseases. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media, 2016. 224 p. (In Russ).

2. Cowan A.J., Allen C., Barac A. et al. Global burden of multiple myeloma: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2016. JAMA Oncol 2018;4(9):1221–7. DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.2128.

3. Luchinin A.S., Semochkin S.V., Minaeva N.V. et al. Epidemiology of multiple myeloma according to the Kirov region population registers. Onkogematologiya = Oncohematology 2017;12(3):50–6. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17650/1818-8346-201712-3-50-56.

4. Skvortsova N.V., Pospelova T.I., Kovynev I.B. et al. Epidemiology of multiple myeloma in Novosibirsk (Siberian Federal District). Klinicheskaya onkogematologiya = Clinical Oncohematology 2019;12(1):86–94. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.21320/25002139-2019-12-1-86-94.

5. Rajkumar S.V., Harousseau J.L., Durie B. et al. Consensus recommendations for the uniform reporting of clinical trials: report of the International Myeloma Workshop Consensus Panel 1. Blood 2011;117(18):4691–5. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2010-10-299487.

6. Offidani M., Boccadoro M., Di Raimondo F. et al. Expert panel consensus statement for proper evaluation of first relapse in multiple myeloma. Curr Hematol Malig Rep 2019;14(3):187–96. DOI: 10.1007/s11899-019-00507-x.

7. Moreau P., San Miguel J., Sonneveld P. et al. Multiple myeloma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2017;28(suppl_4):iv52–61. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx096.

8. Laubach J., Garderet L., Mahindra A. et al. Management of relapsed multiple myeloma: recommendations of the International Myeloma Working Group. Leukemia 2016;30(5):1005–17. DOI: 10.1038/leu.2015.356.

9. Semochkin S.V. Biological basis of immunomodulatory drugs using in treatment of multiple myeloma. Onkogematologiya = Oncohematology 2010;5(1):21–31.(In Russ).

10. Liu Y., Huang X., He X. et al. A novel effect of thalidomide and its analogs: suppression of cereblon ubiquitination enhances ubiquitin ligase function. FASEB J 2015;29(12):4829–39. DOI: 10.1096/fj.15-274050.

11. Stewart A.K., Rajkumar S.V., Dimopoulos M.A. et al. Carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone for relapsed multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 2015;372(2): 142–52. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1411321.

12. Siegel D.S., Dimopoulos M.A., Ludwig H. et al. Improvement in overall survival with carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol 2018;36(8):728–34. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2017.76.5032.

13. Moreau P., Masszi T., Grzasko N. et al. Oral ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone for multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 2016;374(17):1621–34. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1516282.

14. Dimopoulos M.A., San-Miguel J., Belch A. et al. Daratumumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone versus lenalidomide and dexamethasone in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: updated analysis of POLLUX. Haematologica 2018;103(12):2088–96. DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2018.194282.

15. Kaufman J.L., Usmani S.Z., San-Miguel J. et al. Four-year follow-up of the phase 3 pollux study of daratumumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone (D-Rd) versus lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd) alone in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Blood 2019;134(suppl_1):1866. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2019-123483.

16. Dimopoulos M.A., Lonial S., Betts K.A. et al. Elotuzumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: Extended 4-year follow-up and analysis of relative progression-free survival from the randomized ELOQUENT-2 trial. Cancer 2018;124(20):4032–43. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.31680.

17. Dimopoulos M.A., Chen C., Spencer A. et al. Long-term follow-up on overall survival from the MM-009 and MM-010 phase III trials of lenalidomide plus dexamethasone in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Leukemia 2009;23(11):2147–52. DOI: 10.1038/leu.2009.147.

18. Semochkin S.V. New proteasome inhibitors in the management of multiple myeloma. Onkogematologiya = Oncohematology 2019;14(2):29–40. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17650/1818-8346-2019-14-2-29-40.

19. Saavedra-García P., Martini F., Auner H.W. Proteasome inhibition in multiple myeloma: lessons for other cancers. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2020;318(3):C451–62. DOI: 10.1152/ajpcell.00286.2019.

20. Semochkin S.V. Ixazomib in the treatment of relapsed multiple myeloma. Meditsinskiy sovet = Medical Council 2018;(10):84–91. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.21518/2079-701X-2018-10-84-91.

21. Kupperman E., Lee E.C., Cao Y. et al. Evaluation of the proteasome inhibitor MLN9708 in preclinical models of human cancer. Cancer Res 2010;70(5):1970–80. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472. DOI: 10.1152/ajpcell.00286.2019.

22. Avet-Loiseau H., Bahlis N.J., Chng W.J. Ixazomib significantly prolongs progression-free survival in high-risk relapsed/ refractory myeloma patients. Blood 2017;130(24):2610–8. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2017-06-791228.

23. Malavasi F., Faini A.C. Mechanism of action of a new anti-CD38 antibody: enhancing myeloma immunotherapy. Clin Cancer Res 2019;25(10):2946–8. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-0260.

24. Votyakova O.M. Elotuzumab for treatment of multiple myeloma (literature review). Klinicheskaya onkogematologiya = Clinical Oncohematology 2016;9(4):438–45. (In Russ). DOI: 10.21320/2500-2139-2016-9-4438-445.

25. Dimopoulos M.A., Goldschmidt H., Niesvizky R. et al. Carfilzomib or bortezomib in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (ENDEAVOR): an interim overall survival analysis of an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2017;18(10):1327–37. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30578-8.

26. Orlowski R.Z., Moreau P., Niesvizky R. et al. Carfilzomib-dexamethasone versus bortezomib-dexamethasone in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: updated overall survival, safety, and subgroups. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk 2019;19(8):522–30. DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2019.04.018.

27. Catley L., Weisberg E., Kiziltepe T. et al. Aggresome induction by proteasome inhibitor bortezomib and alpha-tubulin hyperacetylation by tubulin deacetylase (TDAC) inhibitor LBH589 are synergistic in myeloma cells. Blood 2006;108(10):3441–9. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2006-04-016055.

28. Richardson P.G., Hungria V.T., Yoon S.S. et al. Panobinostat plus bortezomib and dexamethasone in previously treated multiple myeloma: outcomes by prior treatment. Blood 2016;127(6):713–21. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2015-09-665018.

29. San-Miguel J.F., Hungria V.T., Yoon S.S. et al. Overall survival of patients with relapsed multiple myeloma treated with panobinostat or placebo plus bortezomib and dexamethasone (the PANORAMA 1 trial): a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Haematol 2016;3(11):e506–15. DOI: 10.1016/S2352-3026(16)30147-8.

30. Spencer A., Lentzsch S., Weisel K. et al. Daratumumab plus bortezomib and dexamethasone versus bortezomib and dexamethasone in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: updated analysis of CASTOR. Haematologica 2018;103(12):2079–87. DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2018.194118.

31. Weisel K.C., Sonneveld P., Mateos M.V., et al. Efficacy and safety of daratumumab, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (D-Vd) versus bortezomib and dexamethasone (Vd) in first relapse patients(pts) with multiple myeloma (MM): four-year update of castor. Blood 2019;134(suppl_1):3192. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2019-123527.

32. Jakubowiak A., Offidani M., Pégourie B. et al. Randomized phase 2 study: elotuzumab plus bortezomib/dexamethasone vs bortezomib/dexamethasone for relapsed/refractory MM. Blood 2016;127(23):2833–40. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2016-01-694604.

33. Gong J.N., Khong T., Segal D. et al. Hierarchy for targeting prosurvival BCL2 family proteins in multiple myeloma: pivotal role of MCL1. Blood 2016;128(14):1834–44. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2016-03-704908.

34. Kaufman J.L., Gasparetto C., Schjesvold F.H. et al. Phase I/II study evaluating the safety and efficacy of venetoclax in combination with dexamethasone as targeted therapy for patients with t(11;14) relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Blood 2019;134(suppl_1):926. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2019-125871.

35. Harrison S., Cavo M., Rubia J. et al. T(11;14) and high BCL2 expression are predictive biomarkers of response to venetoclax in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: biomarker analyses from the phase 3 BELLINI study. Blood 2019;134(suppl_1):142. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2019-126094.

36. Richardson P.G., Oriol A., Beksac M. et al. Pomalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma previously treated with lenalidomide (OPTIMISMM): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2019;20(6):781–94. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30152-4.

37. Moreau P., Joshua D., Chng W.J. et al. Impact of prior treatment on patients with relapsed multiple myeloma treated with carfilzomib and dexamethasone vs bortezomib and dexamethasone in the phase 3 ENDEAVOR study. Leukemia 2017;31(1):115–22. DOI: 10.1038/leu.2016.186.

38. Wong C.H., Siah K.W., Lo A.W. Estimation of clinical trial success rates and related parameters. Biostatistics 2019;20(2):273–86. DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxx069.

39. Gupta N., Hanley M.J., Diderichsen P.M. et al. Model-informed drug development for ixazomib, an oral proteasome inhibitor. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2019;105(2):376–87. DOI: 10.1002/cpt.1047.

40. Weisel K., Majer I., DeCosta L. et al. Carfilzomib and dexamethasone versus eight cycles of bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: an indirect comparison using data from the phase 3 ENDEAVOR and CASTOR trials. Leuk Lymphoma 2020;61(1):37–46. DOI: 10.1080/10428194.2019.1648806.

41. McCarthy P.L., Holstein S.A., Petrucci M.T. et al. Lenalidomide maintenance after ¬autologous stem-cell transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol 2017;35(29):3279–89. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2017.72.6679.

42. Jackson G.H., Davies F.E., Pawlyn C. et аl. Lenalidomide maintenance versus observation for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (Myeloma XI): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2019;20(1):57–73. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30687-9.


Review

For citations:


Semochkin S.V. Long-term continuous treatment as a new strategy for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Oncohematology. 2020;15(2):29-41. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17650/1818-8346-2020-15-2-29-41

Views: 11093


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1818-8346 (Print)
ISSN 2413-4023 (Online)