Факторы прогноза эффективности получения аутологичных клеток-предшественников гемопоэза для последующей трансплантации после высокодозной химиотерапии. Обзор литературы и собственные данные
https://doi.org/10.17650/1818-8346-2008-0-3-34-44
Аннотация
Получение достаточного для быстрого и стабильного восстановления кроветворения числа клеток-предшественников гемопоэза (КПГ) является одним из основных условий безопасного проведения высокодозной химиотерапии. В статье приведен анализ существующих подходов к мобилизации и сбору КПГ, факторов, влияющих на их эффективность. На значительном собственном материале (264 пациента, прошедших процедуры мобилизации) показано, что ни один из факторов прогноза (возраст, множественные курсы химиотерапии в анамнезе, содержание CD34+ клеток в периферической крови в момент сбора и т.д.) не позволяет выявить больных с заведомо неэффективным сбором КПГ периферической крови. В то же время комбинированная мобилизация с использованием миелостимулирующих факторов (гранулоцитарный, гранулоцитарно-макрофагальный колониестимулирующие факторы) и цитостатиков (высокие дозы циклофосфамида) у больных с солидными опухолями и множественной миеломой позволяет получить наибольшее число КПГ из периферической крови.
Об авторах
А. Ю. ПоповРоссия
Н. Н. Жуков
Россия
С. В. Миненко
Россия
Л. Ю. Андреева
Россия
В. В. Птушкин
Россия
Список литературы
1. Румянцев А.Г., Масчан А.А. Трансплантация гемопоэтических стволовых клеток у детей. Руководство для врачей. М.: МИА, 2003. с. 52—3.
2. Wouter H., Dercksen M., Gerritsen W.R. et al. Expression of adhesion molecules on CD34+ cells, CD34+ L-selectin+ cells predict a rapid platelet recovery after peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Blood 1995;85:3313—8.
3. Gazitt Y., Reading C.C., Hoffman R. Purified CD34+ Lin- Thy+ stem cells do not contain clonal myeloma cells. Blood 1995;86:381—6.
4. Chao N.J., Schriber J.R., Grimes K. et al. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor «mobilized» peripheral blood progenitor cells accelerate granulocyte and platelet recovery after high dose chemotherapy. Blood 1993;81:2031.
5. Korbling M., Fliedner T.M., Holle R. et al. Autologous blood stem cell (ABSCT) versus purged bone marrow transplantation (PABMT) in standard risk AML: influence of source and cell composition of the autograft on hemopoietic reconstitution and disease-free survival. Bone Marrow Transplant 1991;7(5):343—9.
6. Sheridan W.P., Begley C.G., Juttner C.A. et al. Effect of peripheralblood progenitor cells mobilized by filgrastim (G-CSF) on platelet recovery after high-dose chemotherapy. Lancet 1992;339(8794):640—4.
7. Langenmayer I., Weaver C., Buckner C.D. et al. Engraftment of patients with lymphoid malignancies transplanted with autologous bone marrow, peripheral blood stem cells or both. Bone Marrow Transplant 1995;15(2):241—6.
8. Schmitz N., Linch D.C., Dreger P. et al. A randomised phase III study of filgrastim-mobilised peripheral progenitor cell transplantation (PBPC) in comparison with autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT) in patients with Hodgkin’s disease (HD) and non- Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL). Blood 1994;84(10 Suppl 1):204.
9. Bolwell B.J., Pohlman B., Andresen S. et al. Delayed G-CSF after autologous progenitor cell transplantation: A prospective randomized trial. Bone Marrow Transplant 1998;21(4):369—73.
10. Canellos G.P. Is there an effective salvage therapy for advanced Hodgkin's disease. Ann Oncol 1991;2(Suppl 1):1—7.
11. Siena S., Dregni M., Brando B. et al. Circulation of CD34+ haemopoietic stem cells in the peripheral blood of high-dose cyclophosphamide-treated patients: enhancment by intravenous recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colonystimulating factor. Blood 1989;74(6):1905—14.
12. Tokuda Y., Okumura A., Kuge S. et al. Multiparameter analysis of the yield of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) mobilized by disease-oriented high-dose chemotherapy and G-CSF for breast cancer patients. Proc ASCO 1995;14:320—5.
13. Weaver C.H., Hazelton B., Birch R. et al. An analysis of engraftment kinetics as a function of the CD34 content of peripheral blood progenitor cell collections in 692 patients after the administration of myeloablative chemotherapy. Blood 1995;86(10):3961—9.
14. Tricot G., Jagannath S., Vesole D. et al. Peripheral blood stem cell transplants for multiple myeloma: identification of favorable variables for rapid engraftment in 225 patients. Blood 1995;85(2):588—96.
15. Ketterer N., Salles G., Raba M. et al. High CD34(+) cell counts decrease hematologic toxicity of autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation. Blood 1998;91(9):3148—55.
16. Richman C.M., Wiener R.S., Yankee R.A. Increase in circulating stem cells following chemotherapy in man. Blood 1978;4:595—6.
17. Kotasek D., Shepherd K.M., Sage R.E. et al. Factors affecting blood stem cell collections following high-dose cyclophosphamide mobilization in lymphoma, myeloma and solid tumours. Bone Marrow Transplant 1992;9:11—7.
18. To L.B., Shepperd K.M., Haylock D.N. Single high doses cyclophosphamid enable the collection of high numbers of hemopoietic stem cells from the peripheral blood. Exp Hematol 1990;18: 442—7.
19. Lie A.K., Rawling T.P., Bayly J.L. et al. Progenitor cell yield in sequential blood stem cell mobilization in the same patients: insights into chemotherapy dose escalation and combination of haemopoietic growth factor and chemotherapy. Br J Haematol 1996;95:39—44.
20. Rowlings P.A., Bayly J.L., Rawling C.M. et al. A comparison of peripheral blood stem cell mobilisation after chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide as a single agent in doses of 4 g/m2 or 7 g/m2 in patients with advanced cancer. Aust N Z J Med 1992;22:660—4.
21. Jagannath S., Vesole D.H., Glenn L. et al. Low risk intensive therapy for multiple myeloma with combined autologous bone marrow and blood stem cell support. Blood 1992;80:1666—72.
22. Socinski M.A., Ellias A., Schnnipper L. et al. Granulocytemacrophage colony stimulating factor expands the circulating haemopoietic progenitor cell compartment in man. Lancet 1988;1(8596):1194—8.
23. Dursen U., Villeval J.-L., Kannourakis G. Effects of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on hematopoietic progenitor cells in cancer patients. Blood 1988;72: 2074—81.
24. Kisinger A., Bierman P., Bishop M. Effects of GM-CSF used for mobilization and after peripheral stem cell transplant (PSCT) for patients with previously treated low grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Blood 1993;82(Suppl 1):613.
25. Levesque J.P. et al. Disruption of the CXCR4/CXCL12 chemotactic interaction during hematopoietic stem cell mobilization induced by GCSF or cyclophosphamide. J Clin Invest 2003;111:187—96.
26. Stahel R.A., Muller E., Pichert G. et al. Dose intensification with autologous marrow support in high-risk lymphoma. Acceleration of hematopoietic recovery and reduction of days of hospitalization with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in a randomized open-label trial. Proc. ASCO 1992;11:331—3.
27. Lane T.A., Law P., Maruyama M. Harvesting and enrichment of hematopoietic progenitor cells mobilized into the peripheral blood of normal donors by GM-CSF or G-CSF, potential role in allogenic marrow transplantation. Blood 1995;85:275—82.
28. Demirkazik A., Armitage J.O., Bierman P.J. et al. Factors affecting progenitor cell and tumor cell content of blood stem cell harvests of lymphoma patients. Program and abstracts of the 40th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Hematology, Miami, FL, 1998.
29. Franklin W., Glaspy J., Pflaumeret S. et al. Incidence of tumor-cell contamination in leukapheresis products of breast cancer patients mobilized with stem cell factor and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) or with G-CSF alone. Blood 1999;94(1):340—7.
30. Schwartzberg L.S., Birch R., Hazelton B. et al. Peripheral blood stem cell obilization by chemotherapy with and without recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. J Hematother 1992;1:317—27.
31. Brugger W., Bross K., Frisch J. Mobilization of PBPC by sequential administration of interleukin 3 and granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor following polychemotherapy with etoposide, ifosfamide, and cisplatin. Blood 1992;79(5):1193—2000.
32. Gianni A.M., Bregni M., Siena S. et al. Recombinant human granulocytemacrophage colony-stimulating factor reduces hematologic toxicity and widens clinical applicability of high-dose cyclophosphamide treatment in breast cancer and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 1990;8:768—78.
33. Schwartzberg L.S. Peripheral blood stem cell mobilization in the out-patient setting. In: Peripheral blood stem cell autografts. E.W. Wunder, P.R. Henon, eds. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 1993. p. 177—84.
34. Elias A.D., Ayash L., Anderson R.C. et al. Modilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells by chemotherapy and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor for hematologic support after high-dose intensification for breast cancer. Blood 1992;79:3036—44.
35. Андреева Л.Ю., Тупицын Н.Н., Кадагидзе В.В. и др. Стволовые гемопоэтические клетки в крови онкологических больных, экспрессия CD34 и колониеобразование. Пробл гематол трансфузиол 1999;(4):4—11.
36. Птушкин В.В., Селидовкин Г.Д. Методические аспекты получения гемопоэтического трансплантационного материала из костного мозга и периферической крови. Трансплантол искусств орган 1995;(4):34—40.
37. Птушкин В.В., Селидовкин Г.Д., Чимишкян К.Л. и др. Применение аутологичных клеток предшественников гемопоэза из периферической крови для трансплантации у больных с гематологическими и солидными новообразованиями после ВХТ. Гематол трансфузиол 1996;41(1):9—13.
38. Van Z.G., Liang Y. The role of stem cells in aging. Exp Hematol 2003;31: 659—72.
39. Geiger H., Van Z.G. The aging of lympho-hematopoietic stem cells. Nat Immunol 2002;3:329—33.
40. Xing Z., Ryan M.A., Daria D. et al. Increased hematopoietic stem cell mobilization in aged mice. Blood 2006;108:2190—7.
41. Boiret N., Bons J.-M., Halle P. et al. G-CSF mobilized PB CD34+ cells from children and adults contain LTC-IC with the same frequency and producing the same numbers of CFC. Program and abstracts of the 41st American Society of Hematology Annual Meeting. Blood 1999;94:327.
42. Jantunen E., Kuittinen T., Penttila K. et al. High-dose melphalan (200 mg/m2) supported by autologous stem cell transplantation is safe and effective in elderly (≥65 years) myeloma patients: comparison with younger patients treated on the same protocol. Bone Marrow Transplant 2006;37:917—22.
43. Kopf B., De Giorgi U., Vertogen B. et al. A randomized study comparing filgrastim versus lenograstim versus molgramostim plus chemotherapy for peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization. Bone Marrow Transplant 2006;38:407—12.
44. Nowrousian M.R., Waschke S., Bojko P. et al. Impact of chemotherapy regimen and hematopoietic growth factor on mobilization and collection of peripheral blood stem cells in cancer patients. Ann Oncol 2003;14(Suppl 1):29—36
45. Peters W.P., Rosner G., Ross M. et al. Comparative effects of granulocytemacrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) on priming peripheral blood progenitor cells for use with autologous bone marrow after high-dose chemotherapy. Blood 1993;81:1709—19.
46. Koc O.N., Gerson S.L., Cooper B.W. et al. Randomized cross-over trial of progenitor-cell mobilization: high-dose cyclophosphamide plus granulocytecolony- stimulating factor (G-CSF) versus granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor plus G-CSF. J Clin Oncol 2000;18:1824—30.
47. Weaver C.H., Schulman K.A., Buckner C.D. Mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells following myelosuppressive chemotherapy: a randomized comparison of filgrastim, sargramostim, or sequential sargramostim and filgrastim. Bone Marrow Transplant 2001;27(Suppl 2):23—9.
48. Roy V., Mandanas R.A., Carter T.H. et al. Randomized comparison of two GCSF schedules for peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization in high-risk breast cancer patients. Program and abstracts of the 41st American Society of Hematology Annual Meeting. Blood 1999;94:326.
49. Wingard J.R. Stem cells mobilization: Medley of option, even second chances. Program and abstracts of the 41st American Society of Hematology Annual Mecting. Blood 1999;94:327.
50. Watts M.J., Sullivan A.M., Jamieson E. et al. Progenitor-cell mobilization after low-dose cyclophosphamide and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor: an analysis of progenitor-cell quantity and quality and factors predicting for these parameters in 101 pretreated patients with malignant lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 1997;15:535—46.
51. Ashihara E., Shimazaki C., Okano A. et al. Feasibility and efficacy of highdose etoposide followed by low-dose G-CSF as a mobilization regimen in patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Haematologica 2000;85:1112—4.
52. Pucci G., Irrera G., Martino M. et al. High-dose etoposide enables the collection of peripheral blood stem cells in patients who failed cyclophosphamideinduced mobilization. Br J Haematol 1998;100:612—3.
53. Kanfer E.J., McGuigan D., Samson D. et al. High-dose etoposide with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells: efficacy and toxicity at three dose levels. Br J Cancer 1998;78:928—32.
54. Reiser M., Josting A., Draube A. et al. Successful peripheral blood stem cell mobilization with etoposide (VP-16) in patients with relapsed or resistant lymphoma who failed cyclophosphamide mobilization. Bone Marrow Transplant 1999;23:1223—8.
55. Vogel W., Kunert C., Blumenstengel K. et al. Correlation between granulocyte/macrophage-colonyforming units and CD34+ cells in apheresis products from patients treated with different chemotherapy regimens and granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor to mobilize peripheral blood progenitor cells. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 1998;124:341—5.
56. Brugger W., Birken R., Bertz H. et al. Peripheral blood progenitor cells mobilized by chemotherapy plus granulocytecolony stimulating factor accelerate both neutrophil and platelet recovery after high-dose VP16, ifosfamide and cisplatin. Br J Haematol 1993;84:402—7.
57. Copelan E.A., Ceselski S.K., Ezzone S.A. et al. Mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells with high-dose etoposide and granulocyte colonystimulating factor in patients with breast cancer, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, and Hodgkin’s disease. J Clin Oncol 1997;15:759—65.
58. Dreger P., Kloss M., Petersen B. et al. Autologous progenitor cell transplantation: prior exposure to stem cell-toxic drugs determines yield and engraftment of peripheral blood progenitor cell but not of bone marrow grafts. Blood 1995;86(10):3970—8.
59. Скрягин А.Е. Оптимизация технологии мобилизации и коллекции стволовых клеток периферической крови для аутотрансплантации. Автореф. дисс. … канд. мед. наук. 2006.
60. O'Donnell P., Loper K., Flinn I. et al. Effect of fludarabine chemotherapy on peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT). Program and abstracts of the 40th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Hematology, Miami, FL., 1998.
61. Chabannon C., Le Coroller A.-G., Faucher C. et al. Patient condition affects the collection of peripheral blood progenitors after priming with recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. J Hematother 1995;4:171—9.
Рецензия
Для цитирования:
Попов А.Ю., Жуков Н.Н., Миненко С.В., Андреева Л.Ю., Птушкин В.В. Факторы прогноза эффективности получения аутологичных клеток-предшественников гемопоэза для последующей трансплантации после высокодозной химиотерапии. Обзор литературы и собственные данные. Онкогематология. 2008;(3):34-44. https://doi.org/10.17650/1818-8346-2008-0-3-34-44
For citation:
Popov A.Yu., Zhukov N.N., Minenko S.V., Andreyeva L.Yu., Ptushkin V.V. Prognostic factors of the efficiency of obtaining the autologous precursor cells of hemopoiesis for further transplantation after large-dose chemotherapy: review of literature and the authors' data. Oncohematology. 2008;(3):34-44. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17650/1818-8346-2008-0-3-34-44