Influence of platelet antigens differences between donor and recipient on neutropenia and thrombocytopenia duration after allogeneic stem cell transplantation
https://doi.org/10.17650/1818-8346-2009-0-1-39-43
Abstract
Purpose: to study influence of platelet antigens system (HPA — Human Platelet Antigens) differences between donor and recipient on neutropenia and trombocytopenia duration after hematopoietic stem cells transplantation (HSCT).
Materials and methods: 40 patients at the age from 19 till 55 years (a median age ~ 28.5) after allogeneic HSCT from HLA-identical sibling are included in the study. For the majority of patients (94%) a source of haematopoetic stem cells (HSC) were a bone marrow. 28 patients received myeloablative conditioning regimens and 12 patients — a lowered intensity conditioning. Achievement of 0.5×109/l or more considered as beginning of neutrophil count recovery. As the beginning of platelet count recovery considered achievement value of 50×109/l after platelet transfusions stopping. Identification of eight allele ≪a≫ and ≪b≫ genes HPA-1,-2,-3 and-5 locuses performed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with use allele-specific primers. Serological HlAtyping performed by microlymphocytotoxic test with use of specific serum panels.
Results: the basic criterion of patient groups distribution (HPA-identical — 1st group; HPA-compatible — 2nd group; HPA-incompatible — 3rd group) was identity or qualitative characteristic of their differences with donor for HPA-genes. Earlier neutrophils and platelet counts recovery in patients transplanted from HPA-identical/compatible donor in comparison with patients with HPA-incompatible transplant, it is shown. In first two groups neutropenia duration was 13.45 and 14.3 days, respectively; in 3 groups — 19.0 days. This pattern of recovery was shown irrespective of conditioning regimens and leukemia type. Platelet recovery occurred earlier in patients of 1st (16.22 days) and 2nd groups (18.2 days) in comparison with patients of 3rd groups (24.2 days).
Conclusion: HPA-incompatibility can influence neutrophils and platelet recovery duration after allogeneic HSCT.
About the Authors
L. L. GolovkinaRussian Federation
Moscow
R. M. Kutyina
Russian Federation
Moscow
References
1. Debili N., Robin C., Schiavon V. et al. Different expression of CD41 on human lymphoid and myeloid progenitors from adults and neonates. Blood 2001;97:2023—30.
2. Emambokus N.R., Frampton J. The glycoprotein IIb molecule is expressed on early murine hematopoietic progenitors and regulates their numbers in sites of hematopoiesis. Immunity 2003;19(1):33—45.
3. Порешина Л.П. Эритроцитарный химеризм при близкородственной аллогенной трансплантации костного мозга (особенности проявления, классификация). Автореф. дис. … докт. биол. наук. М., 2004.
4. Garcia-Malo M.D., Corral J., Gonzalez M. et al. Human platelet antigen systems in allogeneic peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation: effect of human platelet antigen mismatch on platelet engraftment and graft-versus-host disease. Transfusion 2004;44:771—6.
5. Rozman P., Karas M., Kosir A. et al. Are human platelet alloantigens (HPA) minor transplantation antigens in clinical bone marrow transplantation? Bone mar transplant 2003;31(6):497—506.
6. Taichman R.S. Blood and bone: two tissues whose fates are intertwined to create the hematopoietic stem-cell niche. Blood 2005;105(7):2631—9.
7. Verfaillie C.M. Adhesion receptors as regulators of the hematopoietic process. Blood 1998;92(8):2609—12.
8. Calvete J.J. Platelet integrin GPIIb/IIIa: structure-function correlation an update and lessons from other integrins. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 1995;208(1):346—60.
9. Shattil S., Newman P.J. Integrins: dynamic scaffolds for adhesion and signaling in platelets. Blood 2004;104(6):1606—15.
10. Debili N., Issaad C., Masse J.M. et al. Expression of CD34 and platelet glycoproteins during human megakaryocytic differentiation. Blood 1992;80(12):3022—35.
11. Gomez-Espuch J., Corral J., Gonzalez-Conejero R. et al. Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa expression on hematopoietic stem cells: constitutive expression or platelet adhesion? Blood 1999;94(9):3271—3.
12. Kanaji T., Russel S., Cunningham J. et al. Megakaryocyte proliferation and ploidy regulated by the cytoplasmic tail of glycoprotein Ibр. Blood 2004;104(10):3161—8.
13. Lepage A., Leboeuf M., Cazenave J.-P. et al. The αIIbβ3 integrin and GPIb-V-IX complex identify distinct stages in the maturation of CD34+ cord blood cells to megakaryocytes. Blood 2000;96(13):4169—77.
14. Дризе Н.И. Кроветворные и стромальные клетки-предшественники в длительной культуре костного мозга. Автореф. дис. … докт. биол. наук. М., 1990.
15. Чертков И.Л., Гуревич О.А. Стволовая кроветворная клетка и ее микроокружение. М.: Медицина, 1984. с. 63—87.
16. Berridge M.V., Ralph S.J., Tan A.S. Celllineage antigens of stem cell-megakaryocyte-platelet lineage are associated with the platelet IIb—IIIa glycoprotein complex. Blood 1985;66:76—85.
17. Fraser J.K., Leahy M.F., Berridge M.V. Expression of antigens of the platelet glycoprotein IIb—IIIa complex on human hematopoietic stem cells. Blood 1986;68:762—9.
18. Ravid K. A tail with a leading role in megakaryocytes: the glycoprotein Ib. Blood 2004;104(10):3004—5.
19. Ярилин А.А. Основы иммунологии. М.: Медицина, 1999.
20. Wickenhauser C., Lorenzen J., Thiele J. et al. Secretion of cytokines (Imterleukins-1р, -3, and -6 and Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor) by normal human bone marrow megakaryocytes. Blood 1995;85(3):685—91.
21. Ковальчук Л.В., Ганковская Л.В., Хорева М.В., Соколова Е.В. Система цитокинов, комплемента и современные методы иммунного анализа. М.: Медицина, 2001. с. 57—60.
22. Фаллер Д.М., Шилдс Д. Молекулярная биология клетки. Пер. с англ. М.: Бином-Пресс, 2006.
23. Nilson S.K., Simmons P.J., Bertoncello I. Hemopoietic stem cell engraftment. Exper Hematol 2006;34:123—9.
Review
For citations:
Golovkina L.L., Kutyina R.M. Influence of platelet antigens differences between donor and recipient on neutropenia and thrombocytopenia duration after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Oncohematology. 2009;(1):39-43. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17650/1818-8346-2009-0-1-39-43