The experience of a multidisciplinary team in maintaining fertility in oncohematological patients
https://doi.org/10.17650/1818-8346-2025-20-3-97-103
Abstract
Background. Over the past few decades, the advancements in antitumor therapy, early diagnosis, and the development of stem cell transplantation techniques have led to a notable increase in the survival rates of oncohematological patients. Although effective chemotherapy has been shown to prolong lifespan, it can also contribute to toxic effects on gland function, which in women can result in impaired fertility and hormonal disorders related to sex hormone production. In order to mitigate or prevent the irreversible complications of antitumor therapy-induced gonadotoxicity, effective and comprehensive strategies that integrate a variety of options for preserving and restoring fertility should be implemented prior to, during, and following the chemotherapy or radiotherapy.
Aim. To test in clinical practice the principles of creating a management plan for oncohematological patients of reproductive age prior to starting special treatment.
Materials and methods. The study included 34 female patients of reproductive age with morphologically confirmed hematological diseases who underwent examination, treatment, and follow-up observation at the State Budgetary Healthcare Institution, City Clinical Hospital No. 52 of the Moscow Healthcare Department. All patients were referred for consultation with an obstetrician-gynecologist to evaluate their hormonal status and reproductive potential. Additionally, a multidisciplinary team, including a reproductive health specialist from REMEDI Institute of Reproductive Medicine LLC, assessed ovarian reserve and selected appropriate fertility preservation technique. A comprehensive review and discussion of all clinical cases was conducted within the framework of a multidisciplinary team, leading to a determination of the feasibility of fertility preservation.
Results. The material for fertility preservation was collected in 82 % of the patients. Hodgkin’s lymphoma was the most common malignancy (76 %). The methods employed for material collection included transvaginal follicle puncture following controlled ovarian stimulation in 89 % of cases and laparoscopy with ovarian resection / ovariectomy followed by cryopreservation of ovarian tissue in 11 % of cases. The fertility preservation methods included oocyte cryopreservation in 71 % of cases, embryo cryopreservation in 11 % of cases, ovarian tissue cryopreservation in 11 % of cases, and both oocyte and embryo cryopreservation in the remaining 7 % of cases. No complications were reported following assisted reproductive technology procedures.
Conclusion. Given the importance of reproductive potential and overall survival in the context of oncohematological diseases, reproductive specialists should prioritize selecting a fertility preservation method before initiating specialized treatment in all patients of reproductive age. The opportunity to procreate constitutes a pivotal component of quality of life for this particular patient population.
Keywords
About the Authors
A. Yu. KishkinaRussian Federation
Anastasiya Yur’evna Kishkina
4 Kolomensky Proezd, Moscow 115446
N. A. Shevchenko
Russian Federation
Build. 3, 3 Pekhotnaya St., Moscow 123182
1 Ostrovityanovа St., Moscow 117513
E. S. Mladova
Russian Federation
Build. 1, 3 Shmitovsky Proezd, Moscow 123100
О. V. Polikarpova
Russian Federation
Build. 3, 3 Pekhotnaya St., Moscow 123182
I. M. Grashchenko
Russian Federation
Build. 3, 3 Pekhotnaya St., Moscow 123182
V. V. Didenko
Russian Federation
4 Kolomensky Proezd, Moscow 115446
Yu. К. Brichkalevich
Russian Federation
Build. 1, 3 Shmitovsky Proezd, Moscow 123100
A. A. Povarova
Russian Federation
Build. 1, 3 Shmitovsky Proezd, Moscow 123100
E. A. Baryakh
Russian Federation
Build. 3, 3 Pekhotnaya St., Moscow 123182
D. D. Ivanova
Russian Federation
Build. 3, 3 Pekhotnaya St., Moscow 123182
S. A. Parts
Russian Federation
4 Kolomensky Proezd, Moscow 115446
28 Orekhovy Bulvar, Moscow 115682
V. N. Galkin
Russian Federation
4 Kolomensky Proezd, Moscow 115446
M. A. Lysenko
Russian Federation
Build. 3, 3 Pekhotnaya St., Moscow 123182
1 Ostrovityanovа St., Moscow 117513
V. M. Grabovsky
Russian Federation
Build. 3, 3 Pekhotnaya St., Moscow 123182
References
1. Miller K.D., Fidler-Benaoudia M., Keegan T.H. et al. Cancer statistics for adolescents and young adults, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin 2020;70(6):443–59. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21637
2. Meeneghan M.R., Wood W.A. Challenges for cancer care delivery to adolescents and young adults: present and future. Acta Haematol 2014;132(3–4):414–22. DOI: 10.1159/000360241
3. Adamyan L.V., Nosov V.B., Stepanian A.A. Fertility-sparing treatment in cancer patients: how can we help in the 21st century? Problemy reproduktsii = Russian Journal of Human Reproduction 2024;30(1):26–63. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17116/repro20243001126
4. Wang Y.R., Pei X.Y. Tumor fertility and fertility preservation in women with cancer. J Ningxia Med Univ 2014;36(1):115–20. (In Chinese).
5. Ohbiki M., Ito Y., Inamoto Y. et al. Improved long-term net survival after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in patients with hematologic malignancies over two decades. Transplant Cell Ther 2023;29(12):768.e1–10. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtct.2023.09.010
6. Wu D., Shen H. Fertility preservation in female patients with hematological disorders. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2022;22(1):61. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-022-04385-9
7. Fleischer R.T., Vollenhoven B.J., Weston G.C. The effects of chemotherapy and radiotherapy on fertility in premenopausal women. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2011;66(4):248–54. DOI: 10.1097/OGX.0b013e318224e97b
8. Paradisi R., Vicenti R., Macciocca M. et al. High cytokine expression and reduced ovarian reserve in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma or non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Fertil Steril 2016;106(5):1176–82. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.06.035
9. Graus F., Ariño H., Dalmau J. Paraneoplastic neurological syndromes in Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphomas. Blood 2014;123(21):3230–8. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2014-03-537506
10. Volodarsky-Perel A., Tulandi T., Son W.Y. et al. Impact of extent and biochemical parameters of lymphoma on fertility preservation outcome. Fertil Steril 2020;113(2):400–7. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.09.033
11. Coleman C.E.M., Pudwell J., McClintock C. et al. Modest increase in fertility consultations in female adolescents and young adults with lymphoma: a population-based study. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2021;10(3):342–5. DOI: 10.1089/jayao.2020.0101
12. Ashizawa M., Kanda Y. Preservation of fertility in patients with hematological malignancies. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2020;50(7):729–42. DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyaa043
13. Kiseleva M.V., Lounkova M.N., Egimbaev K.U. Fertility preservation in сancer patients. Own experience. Onkoginekologiya = Oncogynecology 2023;4:72–6. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.52313/22278710_2023_4_72
14. Salamа M., Anazodo A., Woodruff T.K. Preserving fertility in female patients with hematological malignancies: a multidisciplinary oncofertility approach. Ann Oncol 2019;30(11):1760–75. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz284
15. Dobrokhotova Yu.E., Lysenko M.A., Grabovsky V.M. et al. Fertility preservation problem in oncohematological patients of reproductive age. RMZH. Mat’ i ditya = Russian Journal of Woman and Child Health 2023;6(4):362–7. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.32364/2618-8430-2023-6-4-6
Review
For citations:
Kishkina A.Yu., Shevchenko N.A., Mladova E.S., Polikarpova О.V., Grashchenko I.M., Didenko V.V., Brichkalevich Yu.К., Povarova A.A., Baryakh E.A., Ivanova D.D., Parts S.A., Galkin V.N., Lysenko M.A., Grabovsky V.M. The experience of a multidisciplinary team in maintaining fertility in oncohematological patients. Oncohematology. 2025;20(3):97-103. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17650/1818-8346-2025-20-3-97-103