<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="other" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Oncohematology</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Oncohematology</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Онкогематология</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">1818-8346</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2413-4023</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Publishing House ABV Press</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">45</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17650/1818-8346-2013-8-1-59-64</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>PHARMACOTHERAPY</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ФАРМАКОТЕРАПИЯ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject></subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">Modern concepts of biosimilars in hematology and oncology</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Современное представление о биоаналогах в гематологии и онкологии</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Ptushkin</surname><given-names>V. V.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Птушкин</surname><given-names>В. В.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><email>vadimvadim@inbox.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Dmitry Rogachev Federal Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, Ministry of Health of Russia</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">ФГБУ ФНКЦ ДГОИ им. Дмитрия Рогачева Минздрава России</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2013-02-22" publication-format="electronic"><day>22</day><month>02</month><year>2013</year></pub-date><volume>8</volume><issue>1</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en"/><issue-title xml:lang="ru"/><fpage>59</fpage><lpage>64</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2014-07-22"><day>22</day><month>07</month><year>2014</year></date><date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2014-07-22"><day>22</day><month>07</month><year>2014</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-year>2013</copyright-year><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://oncohematology.abvpress.ru/ongm/article/view/45">https://oncohematology.abvpress.ru/ongm/article/view/45</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Biologics are large protein or polypeptide molecules produced by living organisms, which largely determine the efficiency of modern anticancertherapy. Biological products that destroy cancer cells and protect normal patient tissue led to progress in the treatment of breast cancer, colon cancer, kidney cancer, malignant lymphomas and other diseases. But the high cost and complexity of production limit their use. The expiration of patent protection for a number of biological products resulting to the possibility of reduces their costs when issuing an alternative manufacturer. At the same time, biosimilars are produced by living cells (as the original protein molecules), which led to serious difficulties in reaching their identity. The European Union has developed special registration rules for these preparations in order to avoid lack of efficacy or increased toxicity. They include regulations to determine the quality of biological products, requirements for pre-clinical and clinical studies, according to its specific characteristics, as well as the requirements for pharmacovigilance. Implementation of such a strategy has to register in the EU several biosimilars of granulocyte colonytimulating factor. For one of them – Zarzio – in several clinical studies fully comparable efficacy and tolerability with the original preparation was shown, thus providing a significant reduction of treatment cost with equal efficacy and toxicity.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p/></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>oncology</kwd><kwd>biological agents</kwd><kwd>biosimilars</kwd><kwd>neutropenia</kwd><kwd>granulocyte colony-stimulating factor</kwd><kwd>Zarzio</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>онкология</kwd><kwd>биологические препараты</kwd><kwd>биоаналоги</kwd><kwd>нейтропения</kwd><kwd>гранулоцитарный колониестимулирующий фактор</kwd><kwd>Зарсио</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group/></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">1. Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (2007-10-29). “What is a biological product?” U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Retrieved 2007-12-17.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (2007-10-29). “What is a biological product?” U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Retrieved 2007-12-17.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">2. Avidor Y., Mabjeesh N.J., Matzkin H. Biotechnology and drug discovery: from bench to bedside. South Med J 2003;96:1174–86.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Avidor Y., Mabjeesh N.J., Matzkin H. Biotechnology and drug discovery: from bench to bedside. South Med J 2003;96:1174–86.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">3. Guide to Biological Medicines Guide to Biological Medicines http://www. europabio.org/sites/default/files/report/guide_to_biological_medicines_a_focus_on_biosimilar_medicines.pdf.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Guide to Biological Medicines Guide to Biological Medicines http://www. europabio.org/sites/default/files/report/guide_to_biological_medicines_a_focus_on_biosimilar_medicines.pdf.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">4. Cheson B.D., Leonard J.P. Monoclonal antibody therapy for B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. N Engl J Med 2008;359:613–26.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Cheson B.D., Leonard J.P. Monoclonal antibody therapy for B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. N Engl J Med 2008;359:613–26.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">5. Crommelin D.J., Bermejo T., Bissig M. et al. Pharmaceutical evaluation of biosimilars: important differences from generic low-molecular weight pharm. Eur J Hosp Pharm Sci 2005;1:11–7.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Crommelin D.J., Bermejo T., Bissig M. et al. Pharmaceutical evaluation of biosimilars: important differences from generic low-molecular weight pharm. Eur J Hosp Pharm Sci 2005;1:11–7.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">6. European Medicines Agency, Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use. Biosimilar Guidelines. https://www.ema.europa.eu/ema/ index.jsp?curlpages/ regulation/general/general_content_000408.jsp&amp; murlmenus/regulations/regulations.jsp&amp;midWC0b01ac058002958c.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">European Medicines Agency, Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use. Biosimilar Guidelines. https://www.ema.europa.eu/ema/ index.jsp?curlpages/ regulation/general/general_content_000408.jsp&amp; murlmenus/regulations/regulations.jsp&amp;midWC0b01ac058002958c.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Accessed October 20, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">7. Combe C., Tredree R.L., Schellekens H. Biosimilar epoetins: an analysis based on recently implemented European Medicines Evaluation Agency guidelines on comparability of biopharmaceutical proteins. Pharmacotherapy 2005;25:954–62.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Combe C., Tredree R.L., Schellekens H. Biosimilar epoetins: an analysis based on recently implemented European Medicines Evaluation Agency guidelines on comparability of biopharmaceutical proteins. Pharmacotherapy 2005;25:954–62.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">8. European Medicines Agency. Annex to guideline on similar biological medicinal products containing biotechnology-derived proteins as active substance: non-clinical and clinical issues. Guidance on similar medicinal products containing recombinant granulocyte colony stimulating factor</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">European Medicines Agency. Annex to guideline on similar biological medicinal products containing biotechnology-derived proteins as active substance: non-clinical and clinical issues. Guidance on similar medicinal products containing recombinant granulocyte colony stimulating factor</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>(G-CSF) 2006. http://www.emea.europa.eu/pdfs/human/biosimilar/3132905en.pdf.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">9. Deechongkit S., Aoki K.H., Park S.S. et al. Biophysical comparability of the same protein from different manufacturers: a case study using Epoetin alfa from Epogen and Eprex. J Pharm Sci 2006;95:1931–43.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Deechongkit S., Aoki K.H., Park S.S. et al. Biophysical comparability of the same protein from different manufacturers: a case study using Epoetin alfa from Epogen and Eprex. J Pharm Sci 2006;95:1931–43.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">10. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Draft guidance on biosimilar product development. http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DevelopmentApproval Process/HowDrugsare DevelopedandApproved/ApprovalApplications/TherapeuticBiologicApplications/Biosimilars/default.htm. Accessed October 20, 2012.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Draft guidance on biosimilar product development. http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DevelopmentApproval Process/HowDrugsare DevelopedandApproved/ApprovalApplications/TherapeuticBiologicApplications/Biosimilars/default.htm. Accessed October 20, 2012.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">11. Cri-report - Risk – Reward of Developing a Herceptin Biosimilar – A Thorough Assessment. http://www.basearticles.com/Art/1026247/24/Crireport-- Risk--Reward-of-Developing-a-Herceptin-Biosimilar--A-Thorough-Assessment.html.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Cri-report - Risk – Reward of Developing a Herceptin Biosimilar – A Thorough Assessment. http://www.basearticles.com/Art/1026247/24/Crireport-- Risk--Reward-of-Developing-a-Herceptin-Biosimilar--A-Thorough-Assessment.html.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">12. Boven K., Stryker S., Knight J. et al. The increased incidence of pure red cell aplasia with an Eprex formulation in uncoated rubber stopper syringes. Kidney Int 2005 Jun;67(6):2346–5398.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Boven K., Stryker S., Knight J. et al. The increased incidence of pure red cell aplasia with an Eprex formulation in uncoated rubber stopper syringes. Kidney Int 2005 Jun;67(6):2346–5398.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">13. Bodey G.P., Buckley M., Sathe Y.S. et al. Quantitative relationships between circulating leukocytes and infection in patients with acute leukemia. Ann Intern Med 1966;64:328–40.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bodey G.P., Buckley M., Sathe Y.S. et al. Quantitative relationships between circulating leukocytes and infection in patients with acute leukemia. Ann Intern Med 1966;64:328–40.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">14. Lyman G.H., Lyman C.G., Sanderson R.A. et al. Decision analysis of hematopoietic growth factor use in patients receiving cancer chemotherapy. J Nattl Cancer Inst 1993;85:488–93.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lyman G.H., Lyman C.G., Sanderson R.A. et al. Decision analysis of hematopoietic growth factor use in patients receiving cancer chemotherapy. J Nattl Cancer Inst 1993;85:488–93.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">15. Kuderer N.M., Dale D.C., Crawford J. et al. Impact of primary prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on febrile neutropenia and mortality in adult cancer patients receiving chemotherapy: a systematic review. JCO 2007;25:3158–67.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kuderer N.M., Dale D.C., Crawford J. et al. Impact of primary prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on febrile neutropenia and mortality in adult cancer patients receiving chemotherapy: a systematic review. JCO 2007;25:3158–67.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">16. Lyman G.H., Dale D.C., Crawford J. et al. Incidence and predictors of low doseintensity in adjuvant breast cancer chemotherapy: a nationwide study of community practices. JCO 2003;21:4524–31.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lyman G.H., Dale D.C., Crawford J. et al. Incidence and predictors of low doseintensity in adjuvant breast cancer chemotherapy: a nationwide study of community practices. JCO 2003;21:4524–31.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">17. Sörgel F., Lerch H., Lauber T. Physicochemical and biologic comparability of a biosimilar granulocyte colonystimulating factor with its reference product. BioDrugs 2010;24:347–57.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sörgel F., Lerch H., Lauber T. Physicochemical and biologic comparability of a biosimilar granulocyte colonystimulating factor with its reference product. BioDrugs 2010;24:347–57.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">18. Gascon P., Fuhr U., Sörgel F. et al. Development of a new G-CSF product based on biosimilarity assessment. Ann Oncol 2010;21:1419–29.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gascon P., Fuhr U., Sörgel F. et al. Development of a new G-CSF product based on biosimilarity assessment. Ann Oncol 2010;21:1419–29.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">19. Green M.D., Koelbl H., Baselga J. et al. A randomized double-blind multicenter phase III study of fixed-dose singleadministration pegfilgrastim versus daily filgrastim in patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy. Ann Oncol 2003;14:29–35.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Green M.D., Koelbl H., Baselga J. et al. A randomized double-blind multicenter phase III study of fixed-dose singleadministration pegfilgrastim versus daily filgrastim in patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy. Ann Oncol 2003;14:29–35.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">20. Holmes F.A., O’Shaughnessy J.A., Vukelja S. et al. Blinded, randomized, multicenter study to evaluate single administration pegfilgrastim once per cycle versus daily filgrastim as an adjunct to chemotherapy in patients with high-risk stage II or stage III/IV breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2002;20:727–31.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Holmes F.A., O’Shaughnessy J.A., Vukelja S. et al. Blinded, randomized, multicenter study to evaluate single administration pegfilgrastim once per cycle versus daily filgrastim as an adjunct to chemotherapy in patients with high-risk stage II or stage III/IV breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2002;20:727–31.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">21. Verpoort K., Möhler T.M. A non-interventional study of biosimilar granulocyte colony- stimulating factor as prophylaxis for chemotherapyinduced neutropenia in a community oncology centre. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2012;4(6):289–93.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Verpoort K., Möhler T.M. A non-interventional study of biosimilar granulocyte colony- stimulating factor as prophylaxis for chemotherapyinduced neutropenia in a community oncology centre. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2012;4(6):289–93.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list></back></article>
