<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="other" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Oncohematology</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Oncohematology</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Онкогематология</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">1818-8346</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2413-4023</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Publishing House ABV Press</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">416</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17650/1818-8346-2020-15-2-29-41</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF HEMOBLASTOSES</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ДИАГНОСТИКА И ЛЕЧЕНИЕ ГЕМОБЛАСТОЗОВ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject></subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">Long-term continuous treatment as a new strategy for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Длительная непрерывная терапия как новая стратегия лечения рецидивирующей или рефрактерной множественной миеломы</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8129-8114</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Semochkin</surname><given-names>S. V.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Семочкин</surname><given-names>С. В.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p><italic>1 Ostrovityanova St., Moscow 117997, </italic></p><p><italic>3 Pekhotnaya St., Moscow 123182</italic></p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p><bold>Сергей Вячеславович Семочкин </bold></p><p><italic>117997 Москва, ул. Островитянова, 1, </italic></p><p><italic>123182 Москва, ул. Пехотная, 3 </italic></p></bio><email>s.semochkin@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">ФГАОУ ВО «Российский национальный исследовательский медицинский университет им. Н.И. Пирогова» Минздрава России</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff2"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">City Clinical Hospital No 52, Moscow Healthcare Department</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">ГБУЗ г. Москвы «Городская клиническая больница №52 Департамента здравоохранения г. Москвы»</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2020-07-16" publication-format="electronic"><day>16</day><month>07</month><year>2020</year></pub-date><volume>15</volume><issue>2</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en"/><issue-title xml:lang="ru"/><fpage>29</fpage><lpage>41</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2020-07-15"><day>15</day><month>07</month><year>2020</year></date><date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2020-07-15"><day>15</day><month>07</month><year>2020</year></date></history><permissions><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://oncohematology.abvpress.ru/ongm/article/view/416">https://oncohematology.abvpress.ru/ongm/article/view/416</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The prognosis for patients with multiple myeloma has improved substantially over the past decade with the development of new, more effective chemotherapeutic agents and regimens, and improved management of toxicities. Treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma represents a vital aspect of the overall care for patients with multiple myeloma and a critical area of ongoing biologic and clinical research. The choice of regimen at relapse is usually based on the prior response, toxicities, assessment of prognostic factors, age and comorbidities of individual patients, their somatic condition and expected effectiveness and tolerability. The new drugs, such as ixazomib, carfilzomib, pomalidomide, daratumumab and elotuzumab in combinations in doublet or triplet regimens, have greatly increased the treatment armory against myeloma. Long-term continuous therapies as a new strategy for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma have been shown to provide an eradicating of minimal residual disease and deep prolong responses, with the goal of improving progression-free survival and overall survival. The integration of novel agents into the treatment paradigm has shifted the perception of multiple myeloma from an incurable fatal disease to a manageable chronic one. This review discusses the most recent and effective regimens for the relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma treatment, based on the results of recently published phase II and III clinical trials. Analyses the current clinical trial data discussed with a focus on lenalidomide or bortezomib as a basis of new treatment regimens.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Прогноз пациентов с множественной миеломой значительно улучшился за последнее десятилетие благодаря разработке новых более эффективных препаратов и схем лечения, а также улучшению контроля побочных эффектов и осложнений. Лечение рецидивирующей или рефрактерной множественной миеломы представляет собой жизненно важный аспект ведения пациентов в целом и критическую область биологических и клинических исследований. Выбор оптимальной противорецидивной программы, как правило, проводится с учетом особенностей предшествующей терапии и ответа на нее, характера побочных эффектов, оценки клинических и лабораторных факторов прогноза, возраста, сопутствующих заболеваний и соматического состояния конкретного пациента, а также ожидаемой эффективности и переносимости предстоящего лечения. Новые препараты, такие как иксазомиб, карфилзомиб, помалидомид, даратумумаб и элотузумаб в двойных и тройных комбинациях, значительно расширили арсенал противомиеломной терапии. Постулируется, что длительная непрерывная терапия рецидивирующей или рефрактерной множественной миеломы до прогрессирования представляет собой новую стратегию оптимального лечения, направленную на эрадикацию минимальной остаточной болезни и достижение глубокого продолжительного ответа с конечной целью увеличения выживаемости без прогрессирования и общей выживаемости. Интеграция новых препаратов в парадигму лечения сместила восприятие множественной миеломы с неизлечимой фатальной болезни на управляемое хроническое заболевание. В настоящем обзоре обсуждаются последние и наиболее эффективные схемы лечения рецидивирующей или рефрактерной множественной миеломы, отработанные по результатам недавно опубликованных клинических исследований II и III фаз. Анализ клинических исследований обсуждается с фокусом на применение леналидомида или бортезомиба в качестве основы комбинаций с новыми препаратами.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>multiple myeloma</kwd><kwd>lenalidomide</kwd><kwd>pomalidomide</kwd><kwd>bortezomib</kwd><kwd>ixazomib</kwd><kwd>carfilzomib</kwd><kwd>daratumumab</kwd><kwd>elotuzumab</kwd><kwd>panobinostat</kwd><kwd>venetoclax</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>множественная миелома</kwd><kwd>леналидомид</kwd><kwd>помалидомид</kwd><kwd>бортезомиб</kwd><kwd>иксазомиб</kwd><kwd>карфилзомиб</kwd><kwd>даратумумаб</kwd><kwd>элотузумаб</kwd><kwd>панобиностат</kwd><kwd>венетоклакс</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group/></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pop V.P., Kozlov G.K., Pravosudov V.V. et al. Multiple myeloma and related diseases. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media, 2016. 224 p. (In Russ).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Поп В.П., Козлов Г.К., Правосудов В.В. и др. Множественная миелома и родственные заболевания. М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2016. 224 с.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Cowan A.J., Allen C., Barac A. et al. Global burden of multiple myeloma: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2016. JAMA Oncol 2018;4(9):1221–7. DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.2128.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Luchinin A.S., Semochkin S.V., Minaeva N.V. et al. Epidemiology of multiple myeloma according to the Kirov region population registers. Onkogematologiya = Oncohematology 2017;12(3):50–6. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17650/1818-8346-201712-3-50-56.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Лучинин А.С., Семочкин С.В., Минаева Н.В. и др. Эпидемиология множественной миеломы по данным анализа популяционного регистра Кировской области. Онкогематология 2017;12(3):50–6. DOI: 10.17650/1818-8346-201712-3-50-56.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Skvortsova N.V., Pospelova T.I., Kovynev I.B. et al. Epidemiology of multiple myeloma in Novosibirsk (Siberian Federal District). Klinicheskaya onkogematologiya = Clinical Oncohematology 2019;12(1):86–94. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.21320/25002139-2019-12-1-86-94.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Скворцова Н.В., Поспелова Т.И., Ковынев И.Б. и др. Эпидемиология множественной миеломы в Новосибирске (Сибирский Федеральный округ). Клиническая онкогематология 2019;12(1):86–94. DOI: 10.21320/25002139-2019-12-1-86-94.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Rajkumar S.V., Harousseau J.L., Durie B. et al. Consensus recommendations for the uniform reporting of clinical trials: report of the International Myeloma Workshop Consensus Panel 1. Blood 2011;117(18):4691–5. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2010-10-299487.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Offidani M., Boccadoro M., Di Raimondo F. et al. Expert panel consensus statement for proper evaluation of first relapse in multiple myeloma. Curr Hematol Malig Rep 2019;14(3):187–96. DOI: 10.1007/s11899-019-00507-x.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Moreau P., San Miguel J., Sonneveld P. et al. Multiple myeloma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2017;28(suppl_4):iv52–61. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx096.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Laubach J., Garderet L., Mahindra A. et al. Management of relapsed multiple myeloma: recommendations of the International Myeloma Working Group. Leukemia 2016;30(5):1005–17. DOI: 10.1038/leu.2015.356.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Semochkin S.V. Biological basis of immunomodulatory drugs using in treatment of multiple myeloma. Onkogematologiya = Oncohematology 2010;5(1):21–31.(In Russ).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Семочкин С.В. Биологические основы применения иммуномодулирующих препаратов в лечении множественной миеломы. Онкогематология 2010;5(1):21–31.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Liu Y., Huang X., He X. et al. A novel effect of thalidomide and its analogs: suppression of cereblon ubiquitination enhances ubiquitin ligase function. FASEB J 2015;29(12):4829–39. DOI: 10.1096/fj.15-274050.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>Stewart A.K., Rajkumar S.V., Dimopoulos M.A. et al. Carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone for relapsed multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 2015;372(2): 142–52. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1411321.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>Siegel D.S., Dimopoulos M.A., Ludwig H. et al. Improvement in overall survival with carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol 2018;36(8):728–34. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2017.76.5032.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>Moreau P., Masszi T., Grzasko N. et al. Oral ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone for multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 2016;374(17):1621–34. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1516282.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>Dimopoulos M.A., San-Miguel J., Belch A. et al. Daratumumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone versus lenalidomide and dexamethasone in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: updated analysis of POLLUX. Haematologica 2018;103(12):2088–96. DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2018.194282.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>Kaufman J.L., Usmani S.Z., San-Miguel J. et al. Four-year follow-up of the phase 3 pollux study of daratumumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone (D-Rd) versus lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd) alone in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Blood 2019;134(suppl_1):1866. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2019-123483.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>Dimopoulos M.A., Lonial S., Betts K.A. et al. Elotuzumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: Extended 4-year follow-up and analysis of relative progression-free survival from the randomized ELOQUENT-2 trial. Cancer 2018;124(20):4032–43. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.31680.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>Dimopoulos M.A., Chen C., Spencer A. et al. Long-term follow-up on overall survival from the MM-009 and MM-010 phase III trials of lenalidomide plus dexamethasone in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Leukemia 2009;23(11):2147–52. DOI: 10.1038/leu.2009.147.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Semochkin S.V. New proteasome inhibitors in the management of multiple myeloma. Onkogematologiya = Oncohematology 2019;14(2):29–40. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17650/1818-8346-2019-14-2-29-40.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Семочкин С.В. Новые ингибиторы протеасомы в терапии множественной миеломы. Онкогематология 2019;14(2):29–40. DOI: 10.17650/1818-8346-2019-14-2-29-40.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><mixed-citation>Saavedra-García P., Martini F., Auner H.W. Proteasome inhibition in multiple myeloma: lessons for other cancers. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2020;318(3):C451–62. DOI: 10.1152/ajpcell.00286.2019.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Semochkin S.V. Ixazomib in the treatment of relapsed multiple myeloma. Meditsinskiy sovet = Medical Council 2018;(10):84–91. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.21518/2079-701X-2018-10-84-91.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Семочкин С.B. Иксазомиб в лечении рецидивирующей множественной миеломы. Медицинский Совет 2018;(10):84–91. DOI: 10.21518/2079-701X-2018-10-84-91.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><mixed-citation>Kupperman E., Lee E.C., Cao Y. et al. Evaluation of the proteasome inhibitor MLN9708 in preclinical models of human cancer. Cancer Res 2010;70(5):1970–80. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472. DOI: 10.1152/ajpcell.00286.2019.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><mixed-citation>Avet-Loiseau H., Bahlis N.J., Chng W.J. Ixazomib significantly prolongs progression-free survival in high-risk relapsed/ refractory myeloma patients. Blood 2017;130(24):2610–8. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2017-06-791228.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><mixed-citation>Malavasi F., Faini A.C. Mechanism of action of a new anti-CD38 antibody: enhancing myeloma immunotherapy. Clin Cancer Res 2019;25(10):2946–8. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-0260.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Votyakova O.M. Elotuzumab for treatment of multiple myeloma (literature review). Klinicheskaya onkogematologiya = Clinical Oncohematology 2016;9(4):438–45. (In Russ). DOI: 10.21320/2500-2139-2016-9-4438-445.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Вотякова О.М. Элотузумаб в лечении множественной миеломы (обзор литературы). Клиническая онкогематология 2016;9(4):438–45. DOI: 10.21320/2500-2139-2016-9-4438-445.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B25"><label>25.</label><mixed-citation>Dimopoulos M.A., Goldschmidt H., Niesvizky R. et al. Carfilzomib or bortezomib in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (ENDEAVOR): an interim overall survival analysis of an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2017;18(10):1327–37. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30578-8.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><label>26.</label><mixed-citation>Orlowski R.Z., Moreau P., Niesvizky R. et al. Carfilzomib-dexamethasone versus bortezomib-dexamethasone in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: updated overall survival, safety, and subgroups. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk 2019;19(8):522–30. DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2019.04.018.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><label>27.</label><mixed-citation>Catley L., Weisberg E., Kiziltepe T. et al. Aggresome induction by proteasome inhibitor bortezomib and alpha-tubulin hyperacetylation by tubulin deacetylase (TDAC) inhibitor LBH589 are synergistic in myeloma cells. Blood 2006;108(10):3441–9. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2006-04-016055.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B28"><label>28.</label><mixed-citation>Richardson P.G., Hungria V.T., Yoon S.S. et al. Panobinostat plus bortezomib and dexamethasone in previously treated multiple myeloma: outcomes by prior treatment. Blood 2016;127(6):713–21. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2015-09-665018.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B29"><label>29.</label><mixed-citation>San-Miguel J.F., Hungria V.T., Yoon S.S. et al. Overall survival of patients with relapsed multiple myeloma treated with panobinostat or placebo plus bortezomib and dexamethasone (the PANORAMA 1 trial): a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Haematol 2016;3(11):e506–15. DOI: 10.1016/S2352-3026(16)30147-8.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B30"><label>30.</label><mixed-citation>Spencer A., Lentzsch S., Weisel K. et al. Daratumumab plus bortezomib and dexamethasone versus bortezomib and dexamethasone in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: updated analysis of CASTOR. Haematologica 2018;103(12):2079–87. DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2018.194118.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B31"><label>31.</label><mixed-citation>Weisel K.C., Sonneveld P., Mateos M.V., et al. Efficacy and safety of daratumumab, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (D-Vd) versus bortezomib and dexamethasone (Vd) in first relapse patients(pts) with multiple myeloma (MM): four-year update of castor. Blood 2019;134(suppl_1):3192. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2019-123527.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B32"><label>32.</label><mixed-citation>Jakubowiak A., Offidani M., Pégourie B. et al. Randomized phase 2 study: elotuzumab plus bortezomib/dexamethasone vs bortezomib/dexamethasone for relapsed/refractory MM. Blood 2016;127(23):2833–40. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2016-01-694604.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B33"><label>33.</label><mixed-citation>Gong J.N., Khong T., Segal D. et al. Hierarchy for targeting prosurvival BCL2 family proteins in multiple myeloma: pivotal role of MCL1. Blood 2016;128(14):1834–44. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2016-03-704908.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B34"><label>34.</label><mixed-citation>Kaufman J.L., Gasparetto C., Schjesvold F.H. et al. Phase I/II study evaluating the safety and efficacy of venetoclax in combination with dexamethasone as targeted therapy for patients with t(11;14) relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Blood 2019;134(suppl_1):926. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2019-125871.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B35"><label>35.</label><mixed-citation>Harrison S., Cavo M., Rubia J. et al. T(11;14) and high BCL2 expression are predictive biomarkers of response to venetoclax in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: biomarker analyses from the phase 3 BELLINI study. Blood 2019;134(suppl_1):142. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2019-126094.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B36"><label>36.</label><mixed-citation>Richardson P.G., Oriol A., Beksac M. et al. Pomalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma previously treated with lenalidomide (OPTIMISMM): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2019;20(6):781–94. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30152-4.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B37"><label>37.</label><mixed-citation>Moreau P., Joshua D., Chng W.J. et al. Impact of prior treatment on patients with relapsed multiple myeloma treated with carfilzomib and dexamethasone vs bortezomib and dexamethasone in the phase 3 ENDEAVOR study. Leukemia 2017;31(1):115–22. DOI: 10.1038/leu.2016.186.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B38"><label>38.</label><mixed-citation>Wong C.H., Siah K.W., Lo A.W. Estimation of clinical trial success rates and related parameters. Biostatistics 2019;20(2):273–86. DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxx069.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B39"><label>39.</label><mixed-citation>Gupta N., Hanley M.J., Diderichsen P.M. et al. Model-informed drug development for ixazomib, an oral proteasome inhibitor. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2019;105(2):376–87. DOI: 10.1002/cpt.1047.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B40"><label>40.</label><mixed-citation>Weisel K., Majer I., DeCosta L. et al. Carfilzomib and dexamethasone versus eight cycles of bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: an indirect comparison using data from the phase 3 ENDEAVOR and CASTOR trials. Leuk Lymphoma 2020;61(1):37–46. DOI: 10.1080/10428194.2019.1648806.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B41"><label>41.</label><mixed-citation>McCarthy P.L., Holstein S.A., Petrucci M.T. et al. Lenalidomide maintenance after ¬autologous stem-cell transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol 2017;35(29):3279–89. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2017.72.6679.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B42"><label>42.</label><mixed-citation>Jackson G.H., Davies F.E., Pawlyn C. et аl. Lenalidomide maintenance versus observation for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (Myeloma XI): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2019;20(1):57–73. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30687-9.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
