<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="other" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Oncohematology</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Oncohematology</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Онкогематология</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">1818-8346</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2413-4023</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Publishing House ABV Press</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">244</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17650/1818-8346-2017-12-2-80-94</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>BASIC RESEARCH</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ФУНДАМЕНТАЛЬНЫЕ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯ В ПРАКТИЧЕСКОЙ МЕДИЦИНЕ НА СОВРЕМЕННОМ ЭТАПЕ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject></subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">FLOW CYTOMETRY IN THE DIAGNOSIS AND MONITORING OF MINIMAL RESIDUAL DISEASE IN MULTIPLE MYELOMA</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>РОЛЬ И МЕСТО ПРОТОЧНОЙ ЦИТОМЕТРИИ В ДИАГНОСТИКЕ И МОНИТОРИНГЕ МИНИМАЛЬНОЙ ОСТАТОЧНОЙ БОЛЕЗНИ ПРИ МНОЖЕСТВЕННОЙ МИЕЛОМЕ</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Galtseva</surname><given-names>I. V.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Гальцева</surname><given-names>И. В.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p><italic>4a Noviy Zykovskiy Proezd, Moscow 125167</italic></p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p><bold><italic>Контакты</italic></bold><italic>: Гальцева Ирина Владимировна </italic></p><p><italic>125167 Москва, Новый Зыковский проезд, 4а </italic></p><p><italic/></p></bio><email>irinagaltseva@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Davydova</surname><given-names>Y. O.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Давыдова</surname><given-names>Ю. О.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p><italic>4a Noviy Zykovskiy Proezd, Moscow 125167</italic></p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p><italic>125167 Москва, Новый Зыковский проезд, 4а </italic></p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Kapranov</surname><given-names>N. M.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Капранов</surname><given-names>Н. М.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p><italic>4a Noviy Zykovskiy Proezd, Moscow 125167</italic></p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p><italic>125167 Москва, Новый Зыковский проезд, 4а </italic></p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Julakyan</surname><given-names>U. L.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Джулакян</surname><given-names>У. Л.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p><italic>4a Noviy Zykovskiy Proezd, Moscow 125167</italic></p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p><italic>125167 Москва, Новый Зыковский проезд, 4а </italic></p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Mendeleeva</surname><given-names>L. P.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Менделеева</surname><given-names>Л. П.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p><italic>4a Noviy Zykovskiy Proezd, Moscow 125167</italic></p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p><italic>125167 Москва, Новый Зыковский проезд, 4а </italic></p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Hematological Research Center, Ministry of Health of Russia</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">ФГБУ «Гематологический научный центр» Минздрава России</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2017-06-27" publication-format="electronic"><day>27</day><month>06</month><year>2017</year></pub-date><volume>12</volume><issue>2</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en"/><issue-title xml:lang="ru"/><fpage>80</fpage><lpage>94</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2017-06-27"><day>27</day><month>06</month><year>2017</year></date><date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2017-06-27"><day>27</day><month>06</month><year>2017</year></date></history><permissions><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://oncohematology.abvpress.ru/ongm/article/view/244">https://oncohematology.abvpress.ru/ongm/article/view/244</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p><italic>Over the past 20 years, approaches to the therapy of multiple myeloma have undergone significant changes, and frequency of achieving remission of the disease increased. The new diagnostic methods allowed evaluating the more deep therapy response and predicting the relapse: allele-specific polymerase chain reaction, next generation sequencing, multicolor flow cytometry may detect a minimal residual disease (MRD) with a sensitivity of 10–5 to 10–6. Evaluation of MRD by flow cytometry is a dynamically developing direction of research. The aim of multicenter investigations using flow cytometry for MRD-searching in multiple myeloma is standardization, increasing the sensitivity and specificity of this method. The article presents data on the methods used in monitoring MRD, as well as advances in flow cytometry. </italic></p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p><italic>За последние 20 лет подходы к терапии множественной миеломы претерпели значительные изменения, и частота достижения ремиссии заболевания увеличилась. Использование новых диагностических методов позволило более достоверно оценивать ответ на терапию и прогнозировать возникновение рецидива: аллель-специфичная полимеразная цепная реакция, секвенирование нового поколения, многоцветная проточная цитометрия позволяют обнаруживать минимальную остаточную болезнь (МОБ) с чувствительностью от 10–5 до 10–6. Оценка МОБ с помощью проточной цитометрии – динамично развивающееся направление исследований. Задачами многоцентровых исследований, использующих проточную цитометрию в качестве инструмента для поиска МОБ при множественной миеломе, являются стандартизация, увеличение чувствительности и специфичности данного метода. Цель публикации – представление данных о методах, применяющихся для мониторинга МОБ и достижений в области проточной цитометрии. </italic></p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>multiple myeloma</kwd><kwd>immunophenotyping</kwd><kwd>flow cytometry</kwd><kwd>minimal residual disease</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>множественная миелома</kwd><kwd>иммунофенотипирование</kwd><kwd>проточная цитометрия</kwd><kwd>минимальная остаточная болезнь</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group/></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">1. Ferlay J., Soerjomataram I., Dikshit R. et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: Sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer 2014,136(5):e359–86. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.29210. PMID: 25220842.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ferlay J., Soerjomataram I., Dikshit R. et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: Sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer 2014,136(5):e359–86. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.29210. PMID: 25220842.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">2. Rajkumar S., Kyle R. Multiple myeloma: diagnosis and treatment. Mayo Clin Proc 2005,80(10):1371–82. DOI: 10.4065/80.10.1371. PMID: 16212152.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rajkumar S., Kyle R. Multiple myeloma: diagnosis and treatment. Mayo Clin Proc 2005,80(10):1371–82. DOI: 10.4065/80.10.1371. PMID: 16212152.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">3. Rajkumar S., Kumar S. Multiple myeloma: diagnosis and treatment. Mayo Clin Proc 2016,91(1):101–19. DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2015.11.007. PMID: 26763514.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rajkumar S., Kumar S. Multiple myeloma: diagnosis and treatment. Mayo Clin Proc 2016,91(1):101–19. DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2015.11.007. PMID: 26763514.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">4. Rajkumar S., Dimopoulos M., Palumbo A. et al. International Myeloma Working Group updated criteria for the diagnosis of multiple myeloma. Lancet Oncol 2014,15(12):e538–48. DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(14)70442-5. PMID: 25439696.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rajkumar S., Dimopoulos M., Palumbo A. et al. International Myeloma Working Group updated criteria for the diagnosis of multiple myeloma. Lancet Oncol 2014,15(12):e538–48. DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(14)70442-5. PMID: 25439696.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">5. DurieB., Harousseau J., Miguel J. et al.International uniform response criteria for multiple myeloma. Leukemia 2006,20(9):1467–73. DOI: 10.1038/sj.leu.2404284. PMID: 16855634.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">DurieB., Harousseau J., Miguel J. et al.International uniform response criteria for multiple myeloma. Leukemia 2006,20(9):1467–73. DOI: 10.1038/sj.leu.2404284. PMID: 16855634.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">6. Kumar S., Rajkumar S., Dispenzieri A. et al. Improved survival in multiple myeloma and the impact of novel therapies. Blood 2008,111(5): 2516–20. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2007-10-116129. PMID: 17975015.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kumar S., Rajkumar S., Dispenzieri A. et al. Improved survival in multiple myeloma and the impact of novel therapies. Blood 2008,111(5): 2516–20. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2007-10-116129. PMID: 17975015.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">7. Rajkumar S. Myeloma today: Disease definitions and treatment advances. Am J Hematol 2015,91(1):90–100. DOI: 10.1002/ajh.24236. PMID: 26565896.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rajkumar S. Myeloma today: Disease definitions and treatment advances. Am J Hematol 2015,91(1):90–100. DOI: 10.1002/ajh.24236. PMID: 26565896.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">8. Palumbo A., Cavallo F., Gay F. et al. Autologous transplantation and maintenance therapy in multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 2014,371(10):895–905. DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa1402888. PMID: 25184862.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Palumbo A., Cavallo F., Gay F. et al. Autologous transplantation and maintenance therapy in multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 2014,371(10):895–905. DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa1402888. PMID: 25184862.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">9. Sonneveld P., Goldschmidt H., Rosinol L. et al. Bortezomib-based versus nonbortezomib-based induction treatment before autologous stem-cell transplantation in patients with previously untreated multiple myeloma: a meta-analysis of phase III randomized, controlled trials. J Clin Oncol 2013,31(26):3279–87. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2012.48.4626. PMID: 23897961.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sonneveld P., Goldschmidt H., Rosinol L. et al. Bortezomib-based versus nonbortezomib-based induction treatment before autologous stem-cell transplantation in patients with previously untreated multiple myeloma: a meta-analysis of phase III randomized, controlled trials. J Clin Oncol 2013,31(26):3279–87. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2012.48.4626. PMID: 23897961.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">10. Rajkumar S., Harousseau J., Durie B. et al. Consensus recommendations for the uniform reporting of clinical trials: report of the International Myeloma Workshop Consensus Panel 1. Blood 2011,117(18):4691–95. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2010-10-299487. PMID: 21292775.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rajkumar S., Harousseau J., Durie B. et al. Consensus recommendations for the uniform reporting of clinical trials: report of the International Myeloma Workshop Consensus Panel 1. Blood 2011,117(18):4691–95. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2010-10-299487. PMID: 21292775.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">11. Chee C., Kumar S., Larson D. et al. The importance of bone marrow examination in determining complete response to therapy in patients with multiple myeloma. Blood 2009,114(13):2617–8. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2009-01-198788. PMID: 19641191</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Chee C., Kumar S., Larson D. et al. The importance of bone marrow examination in determining complete response to therapy in patients with multiple myeloma. Blood 2009,114(13):2617–8. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2009-01-198788. PMID: 19641191</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">12. Kyrtsonis M., Vassilakopoulos T., Kafasi N. et al. Prognostic value of serum free light chain ratio at diagnosis in multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol 2007,137(3):240–3. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2007.06561.x. PMID: 17408464.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kyrtsonis M., Vassilakopoulos T., Kafasi N. et al. Prognostic value of serum free light chain ratio at diagnosis in multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol 2007,137(3):240–3. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2007.06561.x. PMID: 17408464.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">13. Martínez-López J., Paiva B., Lopez-Anglada L. et al. Critical analysis of the stringent complete response in multiple myeloma: contribution of sFLC and bone marrow clonality. Blood 2015,126(7):858–62. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2015-04-638742. PMID: 26089396.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Martínez-López J., Paiva B., Lopez-Anglada L. et al. Critical analysis of the stringent complete response in multiple myeloma: contribution of sFLC and bone marrow clonality. Blood 2015,126(7):858–62. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2015-04-638742. PMID: 26089396.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">14. Lopez-Anglada L., Cueto-Felgueroso C., Mateos M.V. et al. Usefulness of SerumFree-Light-Chains-Ratio (SFLCR) and Serum Heavy-Light-Chains-Ratio (SHLCR) in multiple myeloma in the context of three GEM / Pethema clinical trials. Blood 2015, 126(23), 2962. Available at: http://www.bloodjournal.org/ content/126/23/2962</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lopez-Anglada L., Cueto-Felgueroso C., Mateos M.V. et al. Usefulness of SerumFree-Light-Chains-Ratio (SFLCR) and Serum Heavy-Light-Chains-Ratio (SHLCR) in multiple myeloma in the context of three GEM / Pethema clinical trials. Blood 2015, 126(23), 2962. Available at: http://www.bloodjournal.org/ content/126/23/2962</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">15. Paiva B., Martínez-López J., Vidriales M. et al. Comparison of Immunofixation, Serum Free Light Chain, and Immunophenotyping for Response Evaluation and Prognostication in Multiple Myeloma. J Clin Oncol 2011, 29(12):1627–33. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2010.33.1967. PMID: 21402611.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Paiva B., Martínez-López J., Vidriales M. et al. Comparison of Immunofixation, Serum Free Light Chain, and Immunophenotyping for Response Evaluation and Prognostication in Multiple Myeloma. J Clin Oncol 2011, 29(12):1627–33. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2010.33.1967. PMID: 21402611.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">16. Paiva B., Gutierrez N., Rosinol L. et al. High-risk cytogenetics and persistent minimal residual disease by multiparameter flow cytometry predict unsustained complete response after autologous stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma. Blood 2011,119(3):687–91. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2011-07-370460. PMID: 22128143</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Paiva B., Gutierrez N., Rosinol L. et al. High-risk cytogenetics and persistent minimal residual disease by multiparameter flow cytometry predict unsustained complete response after autologous stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma. Blood 2011,119(3):687–91. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2011-07-370460. PMID: 22128143</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">17. Kuiper R., van Duin M., van Vliet M. et al. Prediction of high- and low-risk multiple myeloma based on gene expression and the International Staging System. Blood 2015,126(17):1996–2004. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2015-05-644039. PMID: 26330243.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kuiper R., van Duin M., van Vliet M. et al. Prediction of high- and low-risk multiple myeloma based on gene expression and the International Staging System. Blood 2015,126(17):1996–2004. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2015-05-644039. PMID: 26330243.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">18. Fonseca R., Bergsagel P., Drach J. et al. International Myeloma Working Group molecular classification of multiple myeloma: spotlight review. Leukemia 2009,23(12):2210–21. DOI: 10.1038/leu.2009.174. PMID: 19798094.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Fonseca R., Bergsagel P., Drach J. et al. International Myeloma Working Group molecular classification of multiple myeloma: spotlight review. Leukemia 2009,23(12):2210–21. DOI: 10.1038/leu.2009.174. PMID: 19798094.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">19. Puig N., Sarasquete M., Balanzategui A. et al. Critical evaluation of ASO RQ-PCR for minimal residual disease evaluation in multiple myeloma. A comparative analysis with flow cytometry. Leukemia 2013,28(2):391–7. DOI: 10.1038/leu.2013.217. PMID: 23860448.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Puig N., Sarasquete M., Balanzategui A. et al. Critical evaluation of ASO RQ-PCR for minimal residual disease evaluation in multiple myeloma. A comparative analysis with flow cytometry. Leukemia 2013,28(2):391–7. DOI: 10.1038/leu.2013.217. PMID: 23860448.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">20. Sarasquete M.E., García-Sanz R., González D. et al. Minimal residual disease monitoring in multiple myeloma: a comparison between allelic-specific oligonucleotide real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction and flow cytometry. Haematologica 2005, 90(10),1365–72. PMID: 16219573.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sarasquete M.E., García-Sanz R., González D. et al. Minimal residual disease monitoring in multiple myeloma: a comparison between allelic-specific oligonucleotide real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction and flow cytometry. Haematologica 2005, 90(10),1365–72. PMID: 16219573.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">21. Silvennoinen R., Lundan T., Kairisto V. et al. Comparative analysis of minimal residual disease detection by multiparameter flow cytometry and enhanced ASO RQ-PCR in multiple myeloma. Blood Cancer J 2014,4(10):250. DOI: 10.1038/bcj.2014.69. PMID: 25303369</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Silvennoinen R., Lundan T., Kairisto V. et al. Comparative analysis of minimal residual disease detection by multiparameter flow cytometry and enhanced ASO RQ-PCR in multiple myeloma. Blood Cancer J 2014,4(10):250. DOI: 10.1038/bcj.2014.69. PMID: 25303369</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">22. Fulciniti M., Munshi N., Martínez-López J. Deep Response in Multiple Myeloma: A Critical Review. Biomed Res Int 2015,2015:1–7. DOI: 10.1155/2015/832049. PMID: 26783530.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Fulciniti M., Munshi N., Martínez-López J. Deep Response in Multiple Myeloma: A Critical Review. Biomed Res Int 2015,2015:1–7. DOI: 10.1155/2015/832049. PMID: 26783530.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">23. Martínez-López J., Lahuerta J., Pepin F. et al. Prognostic value of deep sequencing method for minimal residual disease detection in multiple myeloma. Blood 2014,123(20):3073–9. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2014-01-550020. PMID: 24646471.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Martínez-López J., Lahuerta J., Pepin F. et al. Prognostic value of deep sequencing method for minimal residual disease detection in multiple myeloma. Blood 2014,123(20):3073–9. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2014-01-550020. PMID: 24646471.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">24. Faham M., Zheng J., Moorhead M. et al. Deep-sequencing approach for minimal residual disease detection in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood 2012,120(26):5173–80. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2012-07-444042. PMID: 23074282.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Faham M., Zheng J., Moorhead M. et al. Deep-sequencing approach for minimal residual disease detection in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood 2012,120(26):5173–80. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2012-07-444042. PMID: 23074282.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B25"><label>25.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">25. Kord N., Mailankody S., Roschewski M. et al. Minimal residual disease (MRD) testing in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) patients: a prospective head-to-head assessment of cell-based, molecular, and molecular-imaging modalities. Blood 2014, 124(21):2105.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kord N., Mailankody S., Roschewski M. et al. Minimal residual disease (MRD) testing in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) patients: a prospective head-to-head assessment of cell-based, molecular, and molecular-imaging modalities. Blood 2014, 124(21):2105.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B26"><label>26.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">26. Dimopoulos M., Terpos E., Comenzo R.L. et al. International myeloma working group consensus statement and guidelines regarding the current role of imaging techniques in the diagnosis and monitoring of multiple Myeloma. Leukemia 2009, 1545–56. DOI: 10.1038/leu.2009.89. PMID: 19421229.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Dimopoulos M., Terpos E., Comenzo R.L. et al. International myeloma working group consensus statement and guidelines regarding the current role of imaging techniques in the diagnosis and monitoring of multiple Myeloma. Leukemia 2009, 1545–56. DOI: 10.1038/leu.2009.89. PMID: 19421229.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B27"><label>27.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">27. Hillengass J., Ayyaz S., Kilk K. et al. Changes in magnetic resonance imaging before and after autologous stem cell transplantation correlate with response and survival in multiple myeloma. Haematologica 2012,97(11):1757–60. DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2012.065359. PMID: 22689673.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hillengass J., Ayyaz S., Kilk K. et al. Changes in magnetic resonance imaging before and after autologous stem cell transplantation correlate with response and survival in multiple myeloma. Haematologica 2012,97(11):1757–60. DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2012.065359. PMID: 22689673.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B28"><label>28.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">28. Usmani S., Mitchell A., Waheed S. et al. Prognostic implications of serial 18-fluoro-deoxyglucose emission tomography in multiple myeloma treated with total therapy 3. Blood 2013,121(10):1819–23. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2012-08-451690. PMID: 22689673.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Usmani S., Mitchell A., Waheed S. et al. Prognostic implications of serial 18-fluoro-deoxyglucose emission tomography in multiple myeloma treated with total therapy 3. Blood 2013,121(10):1819–23. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2012-08-451690. PMID: 22689673.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B29"><label>29.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">29. Caers J., Withofs N., Hillengass J. et al. The role of positron emission tomographycomputed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis and follow up of multiple myeloma. Haematologica 2014,99(4):629–37. DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2013.091918. PMID: 24688111.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Caers J., Withofs N., Hillengass J. et al. The role of positron emission tomographycomputed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis and follow up of multiple myeloma. Haematologica 2014,99(4):629–37. DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2013.091918. PMID: 24688111.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B30"><label>30.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">30. Zamagni E., Patriarca F., Nanni C. et al. Prognostic relevance of 18-F FDG PET/ CT in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients treated with up-front autologous transplantation. Blood 2011,118(23):5989–95. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2011-06-361386. PMID: 21900189.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Zamagni E., Patriarca F., Nanni C. et al. Prognostic relevance of 18-F FDG PET/ CT in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients treated with up-front autologous transplantation. Blood 2011,118(23):5989–95. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2011-06-361386. PMID: 21900189.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B31"><label>31.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">31. Bartel T., Haessler J., Brown T. et al. F18- fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the context of other imaging techniques and prognostic factors in multiple myeloma. Blood 2009,114(10):2068–76. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2009-03-213280. PMID: 19443657.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bartel T., Haessler J., Brown T. et al. F18- fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the context of other imaging techniques and prognostic factors in multiple myeloma. Blood 2009,114(10):2068–76. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2009-03-213280. PMID: 19443657.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B32"><label>32.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">32. Loken M., Chu S., Fritschle W. et al. Normalization of bone marrow aspirates for hemodilution in flow cytometric analyses. Cytometry 2009,76B(1):27–36. DOI: 10.1002/cyto.b.20429. PMID: 18548614.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Loken M., Chu S., Fritschle W. et al. Normalization of bone marrow aspirates for hemodilution in flow cytometric analyses. Cytometry 2009,76B(1):27–36. DOI: 10.1002/cyto.b.20429. PMID: 18548614.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B33"><label>33.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">33. Rawstron A., Orfao A., Beksac M. et al. Report of the European Myeloma Network on multiparametric flow cytometry in multiple myeloma and related disorders. Haematologica 2008,93(3):431–8. DOI: 10.3324/haematol.11080. PMID: 18268286.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rawstron A., Orfao A., Beksac M. et al. Report of the European Myeloma Network on multiparametric flow cytometry in multiple myeloma and related disorders. Haematologica 2008,93(3):431–8. DOI: 10.3324/haematol.11080. PMID: 18268286.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B34"><label>34.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">34. Hartmann L., Biggerstaff J., Chapman D. et al. Detection of genomic abnormalities in multiple myeloma: the application of FISH analysis in combination with various plasma cell enrichment techniques. Am J Clin Pathol 2011,136(5):712–20. DOI: 10.1309/ajcpf7nflw8uajep. PMID: 22031309.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hartmann L., Biggerstaff J., Chapman D. et al. Detection of genomic abnormalities in multiple myeloma: the application of FISH analysis in combination with various plasma cell enrichment techniques. Am J Clin Pathol 2011,136(5):712–20. DOI: 10.1309/ajcpf7nflw8uajep. PMID: 22031309.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B35"><label>35.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">35. Ely S., Biran N., Chari A. What we mean when we talk about MRD in myeloma. A review of current methods. Part 1 of a two-part series. Curr Hematol Malig Rep 2014,9(4):379-88. DOI: 10.1007/s11899-014-0238-x. PMID: 25277219.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ely S., Biran N., Chari A. What we mean when we talk about MRD in myeloma. A review of current methods. Part 1 of a two-part series. Curr Hematol Malig Rep 2014,9(4):379-88. DOI: 10.1007/s11899-014-0238-x. PMID: 25277219.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B36"><label>36.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">36. Paiva B., Vidriales M., Mateo G. et al. The persistence of immunophenotypically normal residual bone marrow plasma cells at diagnosis identifies a good prognostic subgroup of symptomatic multiple myeloma patients. Blood 2009,114(20):4369–72. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2009-05-221689. PMID: 19755674.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Paiva B., Vidriales M., Mateo G. et al. The persistence of immunophenotypically normal residual bone marrow plasma cells at diagnosis identifies a good prognostic subgroup of symptomatic multiple myeloma patients. Blood 2009,114(20):4369–72. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2009-05-221689. PMID: 19755674.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B37"><label>37.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">37. Rawstron A.C., Fenton J.A.L., GonzalezD. et al. High-risk MGUS: Identification by immunophenotype, karyotype, and clonal homogeneity. Blood 2003,102(11):36A–7A.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rawstron A.C., Fenton J.A.L., GonzalezD. et al. High-risk MGUS: Identification by immunophenotype, karyotype, and clonal homogeneity. Blood 2003,102(11):36A–7A.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B38"><label>38.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">38. Perez-Persona E., Vidriales M., Mateo G. et al. New criteria to identify risk of progression in monoclonal gammopathy of uncertain significance and smoldering multiple myeloma based on multiparameter flow cytometry analysis of bone marrow plasma cells. Blood 2007,110(7):2586–92. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2007-05-088443. PMID: 17576818.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Perez-Persona E., Vidriales M., Mateo G. et al. New criteria to identify risk of progression in monoclonal gammopathy of uncertain significance and smoldering multiple myeloma based on multiparameter flow cytometry analysis of bone marrow plasma cells. Blood 2007,110(7):2586–92. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2007-05-088443. PMID: 17576818.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B39"><label>39.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">39. Paiva B., Almeida J., Pérez-Andrés M. et al. Utility of flow cytometry immunophenotyping in multiple myeloma and other clonal plasma cell-related disorders. Cytometry 2010: 239–52. DOI: 10.1002/cyto.b.20512. PMID: 20155853.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Paiva B., Almeida J., Pérez-Andrés M. et al. Utility of flow cytometry immunophenotyping in multiple myeloma and other clonal plasma cell-related disorders. Cytometry 2010: 239–52. DOI: 10.1002/cyto.b.20512. PMID: 20155853.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B40"><label>40.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">40. Rihova L., Muthu Raja K., Calheiros Leite L. et al. Immunophenotyping in Multiple Myeloma and Others Monoclonal Gammopathies. In: Multiple Myeloma – A Quick Reflection on the Fast Progress. Ed. R. Hajek. Epub: 2013. DOI: 10.5772/55938.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rihova L., Muthu Raja K., Calheiros Leite L. et al. Immunophenotyping in Multiple Myeloma and Others Monoclonal Gammopathies. In: Multiple Myeloma – A Quick Reflection on the Fast Progress. Ed. R. Hajek. Epub: 2013. DOI: 10.5772/55938.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B41"><label>41.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">41. Reid S., Yang S., Brown R. et al. Characterisation and relevance of CD138-negative plasma cells in plasma cell myeloma. Int J Lab Hematol 2010,32(6 Pt 1):e190–6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-553x.2010.01222.x. PMID: 20201998.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Reid S., Yang S., Brown R. et al. Characterisation and relevance of CD138-negative plasma cells in plasma cell myeloma. Int J Lab Hematol 2010,32(6 Pt 1):e190–6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-553x.2010.01222.x. PMID: 20201998.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B42"><label>42.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">42. Bataille R., Jégo G., Robillard N. et al. The phenotype of normal, reactive and malignant plasma cells. Identification of "many and multiple myelomas" and of new targets for myeloma therapy. Haematologica 2006, 91(9), 1234–40. PMID: 16956823.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bataille R., Jégo G., Robillard N. et al. The phenotype of normal, reactive and malignant plasma cells. Identification of "many and multiple myelomas" and of new targets for myeloma therapy. Haematologica 2006, 91(9), 1234–40. PMID: 16956823.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B43"><label>43.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">43. Ise M., Matsubayashi K., Tsujimura H., Kumagai K. Loss of CD38 Expression in Relapsed Refractory Multiple Myeloma. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk 2016, 16(5): 59–64. DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2016.02.037. PMID: 26997107.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ise M., Matsubayashi K., Tsujimura H., Kumagai K. Loss of CD38 Expression in Relapsed Refractory Multiple Myeloma. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk 2016, 16(5): 59–64. DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2016.02.037. PMID: 26997107.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B44"><label>44.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">44. Kawano Y. Hypoxia reduces CD138 expression and induces an immature and stem cell-like transcriptional program in myeloma cells. Int J Oncol 2013, 43(6):1809–16. DOI: 10.3892/ijo.2013.2134. PMID: 24126540.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kawano Y. Hypoxia reduces CD138 expression and induces an immature and stem cell-like transcriptional program in myeloma cells. Int J Oncol 2013, 43(6):1809–16. DOI: 10.3892/ijo.2013.2134. PMID: 24126540.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B45"><label>45.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">45. Flores-Montero J., de Tute R., Paiva B. et al. Immunophenotype of normal vs. myeloma plasma cells: Toward antibody panel specifications for MRD detection in multiple myeloma. Cytometry 2015,90(1):61–72. DOI: 10.1002/cyto.b.21265. PMID: 26100534.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Flores-Montero J., de Tute R., Paiva B. et al. Immunophenotype of normal vs. myeloma plasma cells: Toward antibody panel specifications for MRD detection in multiple myeloma. Cytometry 2015,90(1):61–72. DOI: 10.1002/cyto.b.21265. PMID: 26100534.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B46"><label>46.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">46. Stetler-Stevenson M., Davis B., Wood B., Braylan R. 2006 Bethesda International Consensus Conference on Flow Cytometric Immunophenotyping of Hematolymphoid Neoplasia. Cytometry 2007,72B(S1):S3. DOI: 10.1002/cyto.b.20362. PMID: 17803189.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Stetler-Stevenson M., Davis B., Wood B., Braylan R. 2006 Bethesda International Consensus Conference on Flow Cytometric Immunophenotyping of Hematolymphoid Neoplasia. Cytometry 2007,72B(S1):S3. DOI: 10.1002/cyto.b.20362. PMID: 17803189.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B47"><label>47.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">47. Kumar S., Kimlinger T., Morice W. Immunophenotyping in multiple myeloma and related plasma cell disorders. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol 2010,23(3):433–51. DOI: 10.1016/j.beha.2010.09.002. PMID: 21112041.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kumar S., Kimlinger T., Morice W. Immunophenotyping in multiple myeloma and related plasma cell disorders. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol 2010,23(3):433–51. DOI: 10.1016/j.beha.2010.09.002. PMID: 21112041.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B48"><label>48.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">48. Stetler-Stevenson M., Paiva B., Stoolman L. et al. Consensus guidelines for myeloma minimal residual disease sample staining and data acquisition. Cytometry 2015,90(1):26–30. DOI: 10.1002/cyto.b.21249. PMID: 25907102.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Stetler-Stevenson M., Paiva B., Stoolman L. et al. Consensus guidelines for myeloma minimal residual disease sample staining and data acquisition. Cytometry 2015,90(1):26–30. DOI: 10.1002/cyto.b.21249. PMID: 25907102.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B49"><label>49.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">49. Peceliunas V., Janiulioniene A., Matuzeviciene R., Griskevicius L. Six color flow cytometry detects plasma cells expressing aberrant immunophenotype in bone marrow of healthy donors. Cytometry 2011,80(5):318–23. DOI: 10.1002/cyto.b.20601. PMID: 21634008.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Peceliunas V., Janiulioniene A., Matuzeviciene R., Griskevicius L. Six color flow cytometry detects plasma cells expressing aberrant immunophenotype in bone marrow of healthy donors. Cytometry 2011,80(5):318–23. DOI: 10.1002/cyto.b.20601. PMID: 21634008.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B50"><label>50.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">50. Liu D., Lin P., Hu Y. et al. Immunophenotypic heterogeneity of normal plasma cells: comparison with minimal residual plasma cell myeloma. Am J Clin Pathol 2012,65(9):823–9. DOI: 10.1136/jclinpath-2012-200881. PMID: 22685235.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Liu D., Lin P., Hu Y. et al. Immunophenotypic heterogeneity of normal plasma cells: comparison with minimal residual plasma cell myeloma. Am J Clin Pathol 2012,65(9):823–9. DOI: 10.1136/jclinpath-2012-200881. PMID: 22685235.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B51"><label>51.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">51. Paiva B., Vidriales M., Cervero J. et al. Multiparameter flow cytometric remission is the most relevant prognostic factor for multiple myeloma patients who undergo autologous stem cell transplantation. Blood 2008,112(10):4017–23. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2008-05-159624. PMID: 18669875.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Paiva B., Vidriales M., Cervero J. et al. Multiparameter flow cytometric remission is the most relevant prognostic factor for multiple myeloma patients who undergo autologous stem cell transplantation. Blood 2008,112(10):4017–23. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2008-05-159624. PMID: 18669875.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B52"><label>52.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">52. Rawstron A., Child J., de Tute R. et al. Minimal Residual Disease Assessed by Multiparameter Flow Cytometry in Multiple Myeloma: Impact on Outcome in the Medical Research Council Myeloma IX Study. J Clin Oncol 2013,31(20):2540–7. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2012.46.2119. PMID: 23733781.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rawstron A., Child J., de Tute R. et al. Minimal Residual Disease Assessed by Multiparameter Flow Cytometry in Multiple Myeloma: Impact on Outcome in the Medical Research Council Myeloma IX Study. J Clin Oncol 2013,31(20):2540–7. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2012.46.2119. PMID: 23733781.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B53"><label>53.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">53. Roussel M., Lauwers-Cances V., Robillard N. et al. Front-Line Transplantation Program With Lenalidomide, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone Combination As Induction and Consolidation Followed by Lenalidomide Maintenance in Patients With Multiple Myeloma: A Phase II Study by the Intergroupe Francophone du Myelome. J Clin Oncol 2014, 32(25):2712–7. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2013.54.8164. PMID: 25024076.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Roussel M., Lauwers-Cances V., Robillard N. et al. Front-Line Transplantation Program With Lenalidomide, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone Combination As Induction and Consolidation Followed by Lenalidomide Maintenance in Patients With Multiple Myeloma: A Phase II Study by the Intergroupe Francophone du Myelome. J Clin Oncol 2014, 32(25):2712–7. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2013.54.8164. PMID: 25024076.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list></back></article>
