Value of accelerated hyperfraction dozes of radiation in primary radiation treatment for Hodgkin’s lymphoma
- Authors: Ilyin N.V.1, Vinogradova J.N.1, Nikolaeva E.N.1, Smirnova E.V.1
-
Affiliations:
- Central Research Istitute for Radiology
- Issue: No 4 (2007)
- Pages: 47-52
- Section: THERAPY OF HEMATOLOGIC MALIGNANCIES
- Published: 23.11.2007
- URL: https://oncohematology.abvpress.ru/ongm/article/view/674
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17650/1818-8346-2007-0-4-47-52
- ID: 674
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Methods: Were examined 145 patients with Hodgkin’s lymphoma (HL) II-IIIAB who received AHF within 1985-1997. A comparison was carried out with the comparable group of 110 patients given CF. The AHF schedule was carried out by admission of the single dose 1,35 Gy twice a day with interval 3,54 hs to basic registration points (bifurcation of trachea and paraaortal lymphatic nodes). The total doses in clinically involved nodes were approximately 40 Gy; zones of subclinical involvement — 36 Gy.
Results: Objective response was obtained 87,4% in the AHF group and 90,0% in the CF group. Median follow-up was 144 months: AHF - 144 months, CF — 150 months. Quantity of recurrences was significantly higher in patients with CF than in those with AHF — 28,3% and 16,5% (p=0,02), respectively. 10-years overall survival was 82,8% in AHF group and 72,1% in the CF group. 10-year recurrence-free survival was 81,5% in the AHF group and 69,8% in the CF group (p=0,04). Analysis of clinical date showed essential reduction of radiation pneumonitis rate at AHF in comparison with CF: 13,1% vs. 25,4% (p=0,01), postradiation pericarditis: 2,1% vs. 7,3% (p=0,04), leucopenia grade IV: 4,1% vs. 12,7%.
Conclusions: Clinical analysis revealed the benefits of single dose decrease from 2 Gy to 1,35 Gy at the twice a day irradiation scheme. The AHF is an effective schedule of RT and promotes to the recurrence frequency reduction, increases recurrence-free survival, decreases of the cardiopulmonary complication risk and leucopenia rate.
About the authors
N. V. Ilyin
Central Research Istitute for Radiology
Author for correspondence.
Санкт-Петербург
Russian FederationJ. N. Vinogradova
Central Research Istitute for Radiology
Санкт-Петербург
Russian FederationE. N. Nikolaeva
Central Research Istitute for Radiology
Санкт-Петербург
Russian FederationE. V. Smirnova
Central Research Istitute for Radiology
Санкт-Петербург
Russian FederationReferences
Supplementary files

