Predictors of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation efficacy in patients with multiple myeloma

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Background. Multiple myeloma (MM) remains a chronic hematologic malignancy. However, treatment outcomes have improved significantly due to the introduction of new targeted agents and high-dose therapy with autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT) into clinical practice. Several researchers have demonstrated that the efficacy of high-dose chemotherapy with auto-HSCT is superior to the use of low-intensity antitumor therapy alone, even in the era of targeted agents. Despite this, disease relapses after auto-HSCT remains a major problem limiting the potential for a biological cure for MM. It is important to identify significant prognostic factors whose correction could help prevent adverse outcomes in MM treatment.

Aim. To determine the efficacy of auto-HSCT and to study progression-free survival (PFS) rates of MM patients depending on various clinical and laboratory parameters.

Materials and methods. The single-center study included 803 patients with MM aged from 19 to 69 years (median 54 years), who underwent high-dose chemotherapy followed by single or tandem auto-HSCT from June 2000 to January 2025. The diagnosis was established in accordance with the criteria adopted by the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) with successively revised parameters and updated in 2014. Before the collection of hematopoietic stem cells all patients received induction therapy, including chemotherapeutic agents only (VAD, EDAP) in 38 cases, bortezomib in 765 cases, lenalidomide in 217 patients, and daratumumab in 51 cases. Single high-dose chemotherapy (melphalan 140–200 mg / m2) followed by auto-HSCT was administered to 515 patients, and tandem chemotherapy was administered to 288 patients. The antitumor response was assessed (revised for the retrospective group) for all patients according to the IMWG-2016 criteria after induction therapy, before auto-HSCT, and on day 100 thereafter. The study results were statistically analyzed using MedCalc.

Results. Immunoglobulin G secretion was detected in 53 % of MM patients at disease onset, plasmacytomas were detected in 39 % of cases, and Durie–Salmon stage IIIA was diagnosed in 71 % of patients. After auto-HSCT, the rate of achieving stringent complete remission was 29 %, complete remission – 26 %, very good partial remission – 31 %, partial remission – 8 %, stabilization of disease – 2 %, and progression / relapse was recorded in 4 % of patients. A total of 320 (40 %) patients with MM showed an improvement in the antitumor response on the day 100 after the first auto-HSCT compared with the results of induction treatment. After completion of the high-dose phase, including one or two auto-HSCT, maintenance therapy was prescribed in 58 % of cases and in 42 % of cases, patients were monitored until progression without post-transplant treatment. The median PFS of patients was 36 months, while the probability of 5-year PFS was 32 %, and 10-year PFS – 20 %. The median PFS in the group of patients with standard cytogenetic risk was significantly higher and amounted to 40 months (95 % confidence interval 32–43) versus 26 months (95 % confidence interval 14–37) in the high-risk group (p < 0.05).

Based on the results of survival parameters assessment depending on the antitumor response achieved after auto-HSCT the median PFS was 104 months in case of stringent complete remission, 29 months for complete remission, 30 months for very good partial remission, 19 months for partial remission, 5 months for disease stabilization, and 4 months for progression / relapse on the day 100 after auto-HSCT (p < 0.001). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that the probability of disease relapse / progression after autologous stem cell transplantation was statistically significantly associated with three factors: stage III (International Staging System), failure to achieve a stringent complete remission after auto-HSCT, and the absence of maintenance therapy (p < 0.05).

Conclusion. A long-term follow-up period allows confirming the high significance of auto-HSCT in the treatment algorithm for MM patients, as the probability of maintaining remission achieved after transplantation for 10 years was 20 %.

About the authors

M. V. Solovev

National Medical Research Center for Hematology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Author for correspondence.
Email: maxsolovej@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7944-6202
Russian Federation, 4 Novyy Zykovskiy Proezd, Moscow, 125167

L. P. Mendeleeva

National Medical Research Center for Hematology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: maxsolovej@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4966-8146
Russian Federation, 4 Novyy Zykovskiy Proezd, Moscow, 125167

M. V. Soloveva

National Medical Research Center for Hematology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: maxsolovej@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4142-171X
Russian Federation, 4 Novyy Zykovskiy Proezd, Moscow, 125167

References

  1. Passweg J.R., Baldomero H., Bader P. et al. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in Europe 2014: more than 40 000 transplants annually. Bone Marrow Transplant 2016;51(6):786–92. doi: 10.1038/BMT.2016.20
  2. Moreau P., Attal M., Facon T. Frontline therapy of multiple myeloma. Blood 2015;125(20):3076–84. doi: 10.1182/blood-2014-09-568915
  3. Palumbo A., Cavallo F., Gay F. et al. Autologous transplantation and maintenance therapy in multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 2014;371(10):895–905. doi: 10.1056/nejmoa1402888
  4. Holstein S.A., McCarthy P.L. Improved survival with salvage autologous stem-cell transplantation in myeloma. Lancet Haematol 2016;3(7):e306–7. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(16)30058-8
  5. Gay F., Oliva S., Petrucci M.T. et al. Autologous transplant vs oral chemotherapy and lenalidomide in newly diagnosed young myeloma patients: a pooled analysis. Leukemia 2017;31(8):1727–34. doi: 10.1038/leu.2016.381
  6. González-Calle V., Cerdá S., Labrador J. et al. Recovery of polyclonal immunoglobulins one year after autologous stem cell transplantation as a long-term predictor marker of progression and survival in multiple myeloma. Haematologica 2017;102(5): 922–31. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2016.158345
  7. Merz M., Jansen L., Castro F.A. et al. Survival of elderly patients with multiple myeloma – effect of upfront autologous stem cell transplantation. Eur J Cancer 2016;62:1–8. doi: 10.1016/J.EJCA.2016.04.004
  8. Holstein S.A., Jung S.H., Richardson P.G. et al. Updated analysis of CALGB (Alliance) 100104 assessing lenalidomide versus placebo maintenance after single autologous stem-cell transplantation for multiple myeloma: a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Lancet Haematol 2017;4(9):e431–42. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(17)30140-0
  9. McKenna R.W., Kroft S.H. Plasma cell neoplasms. In: Hematopathology. 2011. Pp. 410–435. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-7216-0040-6.00025-3
  10. Gertz M.A., Lacy M.Q., Dispenzieri A. et al. Clinical implications of t(11;14)(q13;q32), t(4;14)(p16.3;q32), and -17p13 in myeloma patients treated with high-dose therapy. Blood 2005;106(8):2837–40. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-04-1411
  11. Neben K., Lokhorst H.M., Jauch A. et al. Administration of bortezomib before and after autologous stem cell transplantation improves outcome in multiple myeloma patients with deletion 17p. Blood 2012;119(4):940–8. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-09-379164
  12. Chng W.J., Gertz M.A., Chung T.H. et al. Correlation between array-comparative genomic hybridization-defined genomic gains and losses and survival: identification of 1p31-32 deletion as a prognostic factor in myeloma. Leukemia 2010;24(4):833–42. doi: 10.1038/leu.2010.21
  13. Saad A., Mahindra A., Zhang M.J. et al. Hematopoietic cell transplant comorbidity index is predictive of survival after autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation in multiple myeloma. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2014;20(3):402–8.e1. doi: 10.1016/J.bbmt.2013.12.557
  14. Larocca A., Bringhen S., Evangelista A. et al. A simple score, based on geriatric assessment, improves prediction of survival, and risk of serious adverse events in elderly newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients. Blood 2016;122(21):687. doi: 10.1182/blood.V122.21.687.687
  15. Hagen P., Zhang J., Barton K. High-risk disease in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: beyond the R-ISS and IMWG definitions. Blood Cancer J 2022;12(5):83. doi: 10.1038/S41408-022-00679-5
  16. Avet-Loiseau H., Davies F.E., Samur M.K. et al. International Myeloma Society/International Myeloma Working Group consensus recommendations on the definition of high-risk multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol 2025;43(24):2739–51. doi: 10.1200/JCO-24-01893
  17. Gagelmann N., Eikema D.J., Koster L. et al. Tandem autologous stem cell transplantation improves outcomes in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma with extramedullary disease and high-risk cytogenetics: a study from the Chronic Malignancies Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2019;25(11):2134–42. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2019.07.004
  18. Attal M., Lauwers-Cances V., Hulin C. et al. Lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone with transplantation for myeloma. N Engl J Med 2017;376(14):1311–20. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1611750
  19. Gay F., Oliva S., Petrucci M.T. et al. Chemotherapy plus lenalidomide versus autologous transplantation, followed by lenalidomide plus prednisone versus lenalidomide maintenance, in patients with multiple myeloma: a randomised, multicentre, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2015;16(16):1617–29. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00389-7
  20. Lahuerta J.J., Mateos M.V., Martínez-López J. et al. Influence of pre- and post-transplantation responses on outcome of patients with multiple myeloma: sequential improvement of response and achievement of complete response are associated with longer survival. J Clin Oncol 2008;26(35):5775–82. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.17.9721
  21. Gertz M.A., Kumar S., Lacy M.Q. et al. Stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma: impact of response failure with thalidomide or lenalidomide induction. Blood 2010;115(12):2348–53. doi: 10.1182/BLOOD-2009-07-235531
  22. Majithia N., Rajkumar S.V., Lacy M.Q. et al. Early relapse following initial therapy for multiple myeloma predicts poor outcomes in the era of novel agents. Leukemia 2016;30(11): 2208–13. doi: 10.1038/leu.2016.147
  23. Kumar S.K., Dispenzieri A., Fraser R. et al. Early relapse after autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation remains a poor prognostic factor in multiple myeloma but outcomes have improved over time. Leukemia 2018;32(4):986–95. doi: 10.1038/leu.2017.331
  24. Paiva B., van Dongen J.J., Orfao A. New criteria for response assessment: role of minimal residual disease in multiple myeloma. Blood 2015;125(20):3059–68. doi: 10.1182/blood-2014-11-568907
  25. Gagelmann N., Eikema D.J., Iacobelli S. et al. Impact of extramedullary disease in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation: a study from the Chronic Malignancies Working Party of the EBMT. Haematologica 2018;103(5):890–7. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2017.178434
  26. Cavo M., Gay F., Beksac M. et al. Autologous haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation versus bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone, with or without bortezomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone consolidation therapy, and lenalidomide maintenance for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (EMN02/HO95): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 study. Lancet Haematol 2020;7(6):e456–68. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(20)30099-5

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2026 ABV-press

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77-36928 от  21.07.2009.