Real-world clinical practice of acalabrutinib in chronic lymphocytic leukemia in Russia: interim results of a prospective observational study
- Authors: Morozova I.V.1, Bakhtina V.I.2, Berezina O.V.3, Volkova S.A.4, Glonina N.N.5, Iskhakova A.I.6, Mitina T.A.7, Pospelova T.I.3, Proydakov A.V.8, Turetskova V.V.4, Shelekhova T.V.1, Pavlenko M.A.9, Nikitin E.A.10
-
Affiliations:
- Saratov State Medical University named after V. I. Razumovsky, Ministry of Health of Russia
- Regional Clinical Hospital, Krasnoyarsk
- Novosibirsk State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia
- Privolzhsky Research Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia
- Regional Clinical Hospital named after Prof. S.I. Sergeev
- Republican Clinical Oncological Dispensary, Ministry of Health of the Republic of Bashkortostan
- M.F. Vladimirskiy Moscow Regional Research Clinical Institute
- Komi Republican Oncological Dispensary
- AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals
- Botkin Hospital, Moscow Healthcare Department
- Issue: Vol 21, No 2 (2026)
- Pages: 25-38
- Section: HEMATOLOGIC MALIGNANCIES: TREATMENT
- Published: 25.06.2026
- URL: https://oncohematology.abvpress.ru/ongm/article/view/1103
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17650/1818-8346-2026-21-2-25-38
- ID: 1103
Cite item
Abstract
Background. Acalabrutinib, a second-generation Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has demonstrated high efficacy and an improved safety profile in randomized clinical trials in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. However, real-world data remain essential to confirm its effectiveness and tolerability in broader, less selected patient populations, particularly in regions where such data are limited.
Aim. To evaluate the effectiveness, safety, and quality of life in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia treated with acalabrutinib in routine clinical practice in Russia.
Materials and methods. This prospective, multicenter observational study included adult patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia who received acalabrutinib monotherapy according to physician decision. Patients were followed for up to 96 weeks. Primary endpoints included real-world progression-free survival and safety. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), response rates, factors influencing treatment outcomes, and quality of life assessed using the FACT-Leu (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – Leukemia) questionnaire. Survival was analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier method.
Results. The analysis included 85 patients (median age 65.5 years), of whom 78.8 % received therapy for relapse. High-risk features were frequent, including TP53 aberrations in 73 % of tested patients and unmutated IGHV in 65 %. At week 16, overall response (complete remission + partial remission) was achieved in 79 % of patients. By 18 months, complete response was observed in 65 % and partial response in 28 % of patients. With a median follow-up of 22.4 months, progression was recorded in 3 patients, and median OS was not reached; 1- and 2-year OS rates were 95 % and 90 %, respectively. Survival was not associated with TP53 status, IGHV status, or line of therapy. Diabetes mellitus was associated with inferior OS, likely due to infectious complications. Adverse events were reported in 21.2 % of patients, most commonly infections. Cardiovascular toxicity was infrequent. Quality of life (FACT-Leu scale) significantly improved over time (p < 0.001).
Conclusion. In a real-world Russian cohort, acalabrutinib demonstrated high efficacy, rapid and durable responses, and a favorable safety profile, including in patients with high-risk disease and significant comorbidity. These findings support the broad applicability of acalabrutinib in routine clinical practice.
About the authors
I. V. Morozova
Saratov State Medical University named after V. I. Razumovsky, Ministry of Health of Russia
Email: eugene_nikitin@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6304-9619
University Clinical Hospital No. 3 named after V. Ya. Shustov
Russian Federation, 112 Bolshaya Kazachya St., Saratov 410012V. I. Bakhtina
Regional Clinical Hospital, Krasnoyarsk
Email: eugene_nikitin@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6465-9942
Russian Federation, 3A Partizana Zheleznyaka St., Krasnoyarsk 660022
O. V. Berezina
Novosibirsk State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia
Email: eugene_nikitin@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4584-658X
Russian Federation, 52 Krasny Prospekt, Novosibirsk 630091
S. A. Volkova
Privolzhsky Research Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia
Email: eugene_nikitin@mail.ru
Russian Federation, 10 / 1 Minina i Pozharskogo Ploshchad’, Nizhny Novgorod 603005
N. N. Glonina
Regional Clinical Hospital named after Prof. S.I. Sergeev
Email: eugene_nikitin@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7340-7467
Russian Federation, 9 Krasnodarskaya St., Khabarovsk 680009
A. I. Iskhakova
Republican Clinical Oncological Dispensary, Ministry of Health of the Republic of Bashkortostan
Email: eugene_nikitin@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0009-8122-9344
Russian Federation, 73 / 1 Oktyabrya Prospekt, Ufa 450054
T. A. Mitina
M.F. Vladimirskiy Moscow Regional Research Clinical Institute
Email: eugene_nikitin@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7493-0030
Russian Federation, 61 / 2 Shchepkina St., Moscow 129110
T. I. Pospelova
Novosibirsk State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia
Email: eugene_nikitin@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6791-0314
Russian Federation, 52 Krasny Prospekt, Novosibirsk 630091
A. V. Proydakov
Komi Republican Oncological Dispensary
Email: eugene_nikitin@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5013-6614
Russian Federation, 46 Nyuvchimskoe Shosse, Krasnozatonsky, Syktyvkar 167904
V. V. Turetskova
Privolzhsky Research Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia
Email: eugene_nikitin@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1320-2053
Russian Federation, 10 / 1 Minina i Pozharskogo Ploshchad’, Nizhny Novgorod 603005
T. V. Shelekhova
Saratov State Medical University named after V. I. Razumovsky, Ministry of Health of Russia
Email: eugene_nikitin@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4737-7695
University Clinical Hospital No. 3 named after V. Ya. Shustov
Russian Federation, 112 Bolshaya Kazachya St., Saratov 410012M. A. Pavlenko
AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals
Email: eugene_nikitin@mail.ru
Russian Federation, Build. 1, 21 1st Krasnogvardeiskiy Proezd, Moscow 123112
Evgeniy A. Nikitin
Botkin Hospital, Moscow Healthcare Department
Author for correspondence.
Email: eugene_nikitin@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2490-1263
Russian Federation, 5 2nd Botkinskiy Proezd, Moscow 125284
References
- Morton L.M., Wang S.S., Devesa S.S. et al. Lymphoma incidence patterns by WHO subtype in the United States, 1992–2001. Blood 2006;107(1):265–76. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-06-2508
- Watson L., Wyld P., Catovsky D. Disease burden of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia within the European Union. Eur J Haematol 2008;81(4):253–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0609.2008.01114.x
- Dores G.M., Anderson W.F., Curtis R.E. et al. Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia and small lymphocytic lymphoma: overview of the descriptive epidemiology. Br J Haematol 2007;139(5):809–19. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2007.06856.x
- Jemal A., Siegel R., Ward E. et al. Cancer Statistics, 2007. CA Cancer J Clin 2007;57(1):43–66. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.57.1.43
- Malignant tumors in Russia in 2017 (morbidity and mortality). Eds.: А.D. Kaprin, V.V. Starinskiy, G.V. Petrova. Moscow: MNIOI im. P.A. Gertsena – filial FGBU “NMITS radiologii” Minzdrava Rossii, 2018. 236 p. (In Russ.).
- Eichhorst B., Robak T., Montserrat E. et al. Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2021;32(1):23–33. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.09.019
- Van der Straten L., Levin M.D., Visser O. et al. Conditional relative survival among patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: a population-based study in the Netherlands. EJHaem 2021;3(1):180–3. doi: 10.1002/jha2.368
- Kittai A.S., Huang Y., Miller S. et al. Outcomes of patients with Richter transformation who received no prior chemoimmunotherapy for their CLL. Blood Cancer J 2025;15(1):23. doi: 10.1038/s41408-025-01236-6
- Poddubnaya I.V., Ptushkin V.V. on behalf of the research team. Interim results of an multicenter observational clinical study on treatment strategies for chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma in Russia. Sovremennaya onkologiya = Journal of Modern Oncology 2025;27(2):72–9. (In Russ.). doi: 10.26442/18151434.2025.2.203332
- Wu J., Zhang M., Liu D. Acalabrutinib (ACP-196): a selective second-generation BTK inhibitor. J Hematol Oncol 2016;9:21. doi: 10.1186/s13045-016-0250-9
- Sharman J.P., Egyed M., Jurczak W. et al. Acalabrutinib with or without obinutuzumab versus chlorambucil and obinutuzumab for treatment-naive chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (ELEVATE TN): a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2020;395(10232):1278–91.
- Ghia P., Pluta A., Wach M. et al. Acalabrutinib versus investigator’s choice in relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia: final ASCEND trial results. Hemasphere 2022;6(12):e801. doi: 10.1097/HS9.0000000000000801
Supplementary files


